Former MP Natalie McGarry has come under fire in court after sacking her defence counsel just days before she is due to go to trial.
The ex-SNP politician is accused of embezzling more than £40,000, most of it from the Women for Independence group she helped to set up ahead of the 2014 referendum.
She is due to face a six-week trial starting next week but just days ago decided to part company with her advocate John McElroy.
READ MORE: Ex MP Natalie McGarry denies embezzlement charges
At Glasgow Sheriff Court on Tuesday she sought a four week adjournment in the case to allow her new lawyers time to prepare, but the motion - which was opposed by prosecutors - was refused by Sheriff Paul Crozier.
The sheriff said: “The defence motion is refused, I can’t see why the trial should be adjourned, plenty of time has been given to Ms McGarry and she has chosen to dispense with her counsel.”
As Ms McGarry shook her head in the dock, he added: “Ms McGarry it doesn’t do you any good at all to sit there shaking your head, I made the position very clear on the last occasion.”
The former Glasgow East MP denies three charges of embezzlement and another of failure to disclose “encrypted electronic data”.
She was a prominent Yes campaigner ahead of the 2014 independence referendum.
READ MORE: Former SNP MP Natalie McGarry appears in court over embezzlement charges
Court papers allege that she embezzled money while she was treasurer of Women for Independence and while acting as treasurer, secretary and convener of the SNP’s Glasgow Regional Association.
She is also accused of transferring fundraising cash into her personal account and failing to transfer charitable donations to the Perth and Kinross food bank and to Positive Prison Positive Futures.
Ms McGarry was elected as an MP in the 2015 general election but resigned the party whip just six months later when the allegations first emerged. She was not re-selected to stand in the 2017 general election.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article