The chairman of the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee has issued a subpoena for special counsel Robert Mueller's report into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and the underlying materials.
Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler of New York is asking for the information by May 1. That is also the day when Attorney General William Barr is scheduled to give evidence before a Senate committee and one day before Mr Barr is set to appear before Mr Nadler's committee. Mr Nadler has also summoned Mr Mueller to give evidence.
The subpoena is the opening shot in what could be a lengthy legal battle as Congress escalates its investigation of US President Donald Trump.
If the Justice Department does not respond, Democrats could hold officials in contempt of Congress or eventually fight the battle in court.
The Judiciary Committee voted 24-17 earlier this month to give Mr Nadler permission to issue subpoenas for the final report, its exhibits and any underlying evidence or materials prepared for Mr Mueller's investigation.
Mr Nadler said: "It now falls to Congress to determine the full scope of that alleged misconduct and to decide what steps we must take going forward."
While Mr Mueller declined to prosecute Mr Trump on obstruction of justice, he did not exonerate the president, all but leaving the question to Congress.
Mr Mueller's report provides fresh evidence of Mr Trump's interference in the Russia investigation and challenges Congress to respond. The risks for both parties are clear if they duck the responsibility or prolong an inquiry that, rather than coming to a close, may be just beginning.
"My committee needs and is entitled to the full version of the report and the underlying evidence consistent with past practice," Mr Nadler said.
Mr Barr sent Congress a redacted version of the report, blacking out several types of material, including classified information, material pertaining to ongoing investigations and grand jury evidence.
Mr Nadler said he is open to working with the department "to reach a reasonable accommodation for access to these materials, however I cannot accept any proposal which leaves most of Congress in the dark, as they grapple with their duties of legislation, oversight and constitutional accountability".
Republicans are eager to move beyond what Mr Trump calls the "witch hunt" that has overshadowed the party and the presidency. While Democrats say Mr Mueller's findings are far more serious than initially indicated in Mr Barr's four-page summary last month, they have been hesitant to pursue the ultimate step, impeachment proceedings, despite pressure from the left flank of the party to begin efforts to try to remove the president from office.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, travelling on a congressional trip to Ireland, said in a joint statement with Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer that Mr Mueller's report revealed more than was known about the obstruction question.
"As we continue to review the report, one thing is clear: Attorney General Barr presented a conclusion that the president did not obstruct justice while Mueller's report appears to undercut that finding," they said.
Later, in a letter to House Democrats, Ms Pelosi vowed: "Congress will not be silent."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel