More than 450 former federal prosecutors have signed a letter saying Donald Trump would have been charged with obstruction of justice if he were anyone other than the president.
The letter was signed by former Justice Department prosecutors who served under Democratic and Republican administrations.
It was released by Protect Democracy, an advocacy group formed two years ago which is critical of the Trump administration.
Breaking News: Trump would have been charged with obstruction were he not president, more than 370 former federal prosecutors assert in statement https://t.co/WCamax8lXs
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) May 6, 2019
The former prosecutors say special counsel Robert Mueller’s report “describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge”.
Those actions include Mr Trump’s efforts to have Mr Mueller fired, his attempts to limit the scope of the Russia investigation, and tweets and public statements aimed at discouraging aides from co-operating with prosecutors.
READ MORE: Donald Trump claims victory as Mueller report is unable to lay charge of obstruction of justice
“In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt,” the letter says. “But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience.”
Robert Mueller (Cliff Owen/AP)
Mr Mueller examined nearly a dozen acts by the president for potential obstruction of justice.
He ultimately reached no conclusion on whether Mr Trump had criminally obstructed justice, citing in part an opinion from the department’s Office of Legal Counsel that says a sitting president cannot be indicted.
Attorney general William Barr and deputy attorney Rod Rosenstein then stepped in and determined Mr Mueller’s evidence was insufficient for an obstruction charge.
Mr Trump has used that finding to claim that the report found no obstruction, but the ex-prosecutors make clear that in their view the evidence leans heavily in the other direction.
READ MORE: Donald Trump attacks social media firms after Facebook bans extremist figures
“As former federal prosecutors, we recognise that prosecuting obstruction of justice cases is critical because unchecked obstruction — which allows intentional interference with criminal investigations to go unpunished — puts our whole system of justice at risk,” the letter says.
“We believe strongly that, but for the OLC memo, the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favour of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller report.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel