A former MI6 chief has warned Theresa May that allowing the Chinese tech giant Huawei to have a role in building the UK's 5G network poses an unnecessary risk to national security.
Sir Richard Dearlove said using Huawei equipment could place the Chinese Government in a "potentially advantageous exploitative position" in the UK's future telecoms network.
He joins a growing chorus of senior figures voicing concern after it was reported last month that the Prime Minister is ready to give the green light to the firm supplying "non-core" elements of the system.
His intervention comes as US President Donald Trump signed an executive order effectively banning American firms from using foreign telecoms deemed to pose a threat to national security.
Although it does not name Huawei, it is widely considered to be aimed at the firm following repeated warnings by US officials that it could be used by the Chinese state to spy on or sabotage foreign networks.
In a foreword to a new report by the Henry Jackson Society [HJS] think-tank, Sir Richard said the involvement of Huawei had to be viewed as a "potential security risk" to the UK.
"The fact that the British Government now appears to have decided to place the development of some its most sensitive critical infrastructure in the hands of a company from the People's Republic of China [PRC] is deeply worrying," he wrote.
"The PRC uses its sophisticated technical capabilities not only to control its own population [to an extreme and growing degree,] but it also conducts remotely aggressive intelligence gathering operations on a global scale.”
Sir Richard pointed out that no part of the communist Chinese state was ultimately able to operate free of the control exercised by its Communist Party leadership.
"To place the PRC in a potentially advantageous exploitative position in the UK's future telecommunications systems therefore is a risk, however remote it may seem at the moment, we simply do not need to take," he declared.
The Government has insisted no final decision has been taken on Huawei's involvement in the UK network although the issue remains highly sensitive in Whitehall.
The leak last month of details of a National Security Council meeting, when Mrs May was said have overridden ministers who had expressed concerns about giving Huawei a role, led to the sacking of Gavin Williamson, the Defence Secretary.
Sir Richard said the Government - which has been seeking to build economic links with China - should not be influenced by fears of economic reprisals by Beijing if Huawei is excluded.
"If Australia can blackball Huawei as its 5G provider, the UK can certainly do the same without undue concern about the consequences," he said.
In its report, co-authored by Conservative MP Bob Seely, the HJS said that while Huawei claimed to be a private company, in China it acted like - and was treated like - a state-owned enterprise.
It said the company's organisational structure was "opaque" and it was subject to China's National Intelligence Law, which meant it could be required to assist China's intelligence agencies in their operations and research and development.
It also questioned claims the risks to UK security could be "mitigated" by excluding it from the "core" elements of the network and restricting it to "dumb" components like antennas.
The report said: "Our technical advisers have indicated that antennas can be modified at both the hardware and software level.
"Indeed, as 5G means moving more and more to software-networking, the ability of a manufacturer to re-purpose an antenna without detection will increase."
Huawei dismissed the report as "long on politically-motivated insinuation but short on fact," saying there had been no significant cyber security issues with its equipment in 32 years.
A spokesman added: "We are an independent, employee-owned company, which does not take instructions from the Chinese Government.
"We hope and expect that any decision on Huawei's participation in Britain's build-out of 5G networks will be based on solid evidence, rather than on unfounded speculation and groundless accusations."
A UK Government spokesman said individual countries were taking "a range of different approaches" to the issue of 5G security.
He added: "There are no universal solutions. Whatever final decision the UK Government takes about 5G network infrastructure, the UK is not considering any options that would put our national security communications at risk within the UK and with our closest allies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel