Sir Cliff Richard has moved to New York because he likes the “anonymity” of America, his friend Gloria Hunniford has said.
The pop star, 78, has previously told how the trauma of BBC coverage of the police search of his Berkshire home in 2014, following a claim of historical sexual assault, had left him emotionally drained.
Sir Cliff was not arrested and charges were never brought, and he won a privacy case against the BBC last year.
However, Sir Cliff has now chosen to leave the UK for good, with Hunniford telling The Sun: “Cliff won’t come back and live here.
“He has made that jump now. He was very disillusioned with what happened.”
She said that he “likes the anonymity in America”, adding: “Some people recognise him but he does not get it all the time like he does here.”
TV presenter Hunniford, a long-time friend of Sir Cliff, said that he “loves coming back to perform occasionally and is looking forward to playing summer shows this year”.
But she said she does not think he will ever return to live in the UK full-time again.
Sir Cliff has previously spoken of how the 2014 raid and the following legal battle took a toll on him.
In November, he told LBC: “I think most people know that what I have been through has been pretty traumatic emotionally … It’s been horrible.”
He added: “I finally feel that I came out of that mud and mire, and I’m here again and I’m doing what I’m best at really and what I enjoy most.
“So, if I do sound more excited, it’s probably because I am.”
Sir Cliff sued the BBC over the coverage and in July last year the judge ruled in the singer’s favour, awarding him £210,000 damages.
He previously told The Jonathan Ross Show that he “would never wish that on my worst enemy”.
The Press Association has contacted a representative for Sir Cliff.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel