A ban on smacking in Scotland is “unnecessary” and will “do nothing to help vulnerable children”, campaigners have claimed.
Scottish Green MSP John Finnie has brought forward a member’s bill, which if passed would remove the defence of “justifiable assault” in Scots law, which allows parents to use physical punishment on children.
A majority of MSPs on Scottish Parliament’s Equalities and Human Rights Committee last week stated their support for the proposed legislation.
But some campaigners have suggested it could lead to the criminalisation of parents.
In an open letter, a group of academics, parenting experts and campaigners have urged MSPs to oppose it.
“We are deeply concerned by legislation before the Scottish Parliament to remove the defence of reasonable chastisement and introduce a ‘smacking ban’,” the group write in their letter.
“It is unnecessary, will do nothing to help vulnerable children and will instead cause traumatic intervention in good families.
“The discourse around smacking is dishonest. It conflates ‘hitting’ and violence with smacking.
“But violence against children is already outlawed under current legislation.”
It adds: “The reasonable chastisement defence merely allows a caring parent to use a light tap on the hand or bottom without being charged with an assault.
“A careful examination of the evidence does not find that light, infrequent physical discipline is harmful to children.
“Major studies on smacking are often misinterpreted or misused by academics seeking to further their own political agenda.”
The group suggested the ban would cause stress for parents and make the work of the police and social services more difficult.
Its letter reads: “Removing the defence will leave loving parents open to police cautions and even criminal convictions for behaviour which is, by definition, ‘reasonable’.
“The stress this would bring to parents and children far outweighs any perceived benefits.
“A smacking ban would also make the work of the police and social services more difficult by bringing hundreds of good parents under the remit of child protection agencies, impeding efforts to identify actual abuse.
“The vast majority of Scots do not want to see smacking criminalised, regardless of their views on smacking as a parenting technique.
“We urge MSPs to oppose this legislation when it is debated.”
Mr Finnie said: “As they have done throughout their misinformation campaign, Be Reasonable continue to talk utter nonsense.
“This clandestine organisation should be honest with the people of Scotland and reveal exactly who funds them.
“The overwhelming evidence received by the Equalities and Human Rights Committee and all the international experience tells us that this is the right thing to do.
“I look forward to debating my bill on Tuesday and hope it will progress to the next stage of parliamentary scrutiny.”
Children’s Minister Maree Todd said: “The overwhelming weight of expert evidence – including from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health – strongly backed giving children the same protection against assault that the law gives to adults.
“It also commands support from the widest range of Scottish society including the Church of Scotland, Children First, Barnardos and other major children’s charities. And, of course, it is supported by an overwhelming majority of public opinion.
“Fifty-four countries around the world already prohibit the physical punishment of children. We believe it is time that Scotland joined them by giving children the same protection from assault we already give adults.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel