CONSPIRACY-promoting website Infowars will pay 15,000 US dollars (£11,800) to resolve a copyright infringement lawsuit over its sales of a poster featuring an image of Pepe the Frog, a cartoon character that was hijacked by far-right extremists and racist internet trolls.
Infowars show host Alex Jones has signed a settlement agreement on behalf of his companies with Pepe's creator, Matt Furie.
Pepe the Frog began life as a stoned amphibian with a "blissful" attitude. But as so often happens, prolonged exposure to the internet led him down a dark path. https://t.co/ioPsMF7ZlN
— Liam Stack (@liamstack) June 10, 2019
The California-based artist said he did not authorise Infowars to sell a "MAGA" poster that depicts Pepe alongside images of Mr Jones, US president Donald Trump, far-right agitator Milo Yiannopoulos and other right-wing figures.
Louis Tompros, one of Mr Furie's lawyers, said the settlement amount is more than the 14,000 dollars (£11,000) that Infowars made from sales of the poster.
Donald Trump with a MAGA hat
He said his client plans to donate the extra 1,000 dollars (£800) to Save the Frogs!, a California-based conservation organisation.
Mr Tompros said: "This was more than we would have gotten at trial, and it saves the expense of a trial."
An article posted on Infowars' website called the settlement a "strategic victory" for Mr Jones.
READ MORE: Letters; Our antipathy to Trump is pathetic
One of his attorneys, Marc Randazza, said Mr Furie's lawyers had sought more than one million dollars (£787,000) from Mr Jones, but ultimately settled for a fraction of that after a costly legal fight.
"That ought to be a message to anyone who wants to file a politically motivated, anti-free speech lawsuit against him (Mr Jones)," Mr Randazza said.
The settlement agreement comes less than a month after a judge's ruling drastically limited the amount of money that Mr Furie could recover from Infowars.
US district judge Michael Fitzgerald decided that Mr Furie was precluded from seeking statutory damages and attorneys' fees.
That ruled out the possibility of a six- or seven-figure judgment.
Mr Tompros said plaintiffs' lawyers expected to ask a jury to award roughly 14,000 dollars, which represents Infowars' profits from its sale of the poster.
The judge also refused to throw out the case last month.
Infowars' lawyers argued the poster's depiction of Pepe was "fair use", but judge Fitzgerald ruled a jury must decide that question.
READ MORE: Twitter muzzles conspiracy theorist Alex Jones for a week
A jury trial for Mr Furie's lawsuit was scheduled to begin July 16 in Los Angeles.
The settlement agreement calls for Infowars to destroy any copies of the poster in its possession and bars the site from selling any more copies.
Infowars also agreed not to sell anything else with Pepe's likeness without a licence to do so.
Infowars lawyer Robert Barnes said the settlement has no confidentiality clause because Mr Jones "wanted to tell the world" how little he is paying.
"This is an amount we would have been willing to pay from the very beginning," Mr Barnes added.
Alex Jones
Mr Furie's "chill frog-dude" character made its debut in a 2006 comic book called Boy's Club, and became a popular canvas for benevolent internet memes.
However, internet user-generated mutations grew increasingly hateful and ubiquitous more than a year before the 2016 presidential election, when Mr Furie's creation become an online mascot for white nationalists, neo-Nazis and other right-wing extremists.
The Anti-Defamation League branded Pepe as a hate symbol in September 2016 and promoted Mr Furie's efforts to reclaim the character.
Last year, Mr Furie resolved a separate copyright infringement lawsuit that accused a Missouri woman of misusing the character to sell hate-promoting oil paintings.
Mr Tompros said he hopes the settlement agreement deters others from misappropriating Mr Furie's creation.
"If anyone thinks they're going to make money off Pepe, they're wrong," he said.
Mr Jones livestreams his show on Infowars' website, but he has lost access to other platforms. Twitter and Facebook have permanently banned him.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel