Challenges to Boris Johnson’s desire to lead the country through Brexit were further laid bare when a minister suggested he could vote to pull down his government if it pursues no deal.
The Conservative frontrunner in the race to become the next prime minister said he is willing to leave the EU without a deal as part of his “do or die” commitment to leave by the Halloween deadline.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: UK travellers must wish Johnson and Hunt would shut up on Brexit
But Parliament has shown itself to be hostile to the move, with Tory rebels voting to make the pursuit more challenging.
Health minister Stephen Hammond signalled on Friday that he would be willing to vote down a Johnson administration in a no-confidence vote if it pursued a deal-less departure.
Asked whether he was prepared to press the “nuclear button” with such a vote, he repeatedly cited putting the national interest before personal ambitions.
“I hope we never get there, but I think a lot of people were taught that you must put the interest of the country before yourself,” the Tory MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
“I don’t think we will get there actually, and I’m pretty certain, as a Conservative, that I would be very, very, very cautious about ever doing that.”
He added: “I think it’s really important that, at this historic stage in this country’s lifetime in modern politics, that politicians put aside any of their own personal ambitions or views and actually make sure they do the right thing as they see it for the country.”
But he said he would be “very happy” to serve in Mr Johnson’s government if the former foreign secretary pursues a deal.
READ MORE: MPs vote to thwart any bid to suspend Parliament and force through no-deal Brexit
Mr Hammond dissented from the Government on Thursday by abstaining in a Commons vote that ensures MPs will sit throughout October, making the pursuit of no deal more challenging.
Mr Johnson, unlike his underdog rival Jeremy Hunt, has refused to rule out suspending Parliament in order to force through no deal against their wishes.
Some 17 Tories rebelled in the vote and crucially Chancellor Philip Hammond, Justice Secretary David Gauke, Business Secretary Greg Clark and International Development Secretary Rory Stewart did not take part.
The quartet could pose a challenge to Mr Johnson if he was to win the leadership race and struggle with an administration propped up by the DUP.
The Government’s majority could be reduced to just three if the Conservatives fail to hold Brecon and Radnorshire in the August 1 by-election.
But Jacob Rees-Mogg, an ally of Mr Johnson, poured cold water on the significance of the Commons vote.
“Something that was never going to happen is now slightly harder to do,” he told Today.
The Tory MP also suggested the likelihood of a successful no-confidence vote was slim, accusing MPs of trying to “bluff” their way to preventing Brexit.
“It’s quite difficult unless they have a vote of no confidence and they don’t want to do that because they would lose their seats because any Conservatives who voted against the Government on a vote of no confidence would be automatically deprived of the whip,” he said.
Either Mr Johnson or Foreign Secretary Mr Hunt will become PM on July 24, the day after the result of the Tory leadership contest is declared.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel