Remain-supporting MPs are awaiting Jeremy Corbyn’s next move after his proposal to become caretaker prime minister to block a no-deal Brexit received a mixed response.
Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson wrote to Mr Corbyn to suggest the pair meet “in the coming days” to discuss how their parties could work to stop a no-deal Brexit, but reiterated her belief that it must be someone else who leads an emergency government.
When asked how they would respond to Ms Swinson’s offer, the Labour Party referred back to its leader’s earlier remarks in which he welcomed an “encouraging” response from MPs to his plan.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon - Jo Swinson daft for rejecting Corbyn PM bid
Labour's plan to stop a disastrous No Deal Brexit and let the people decide the future of our country. pic.twitter.com/uUhF5fyVtq
— The Labour Party (@UKLabour) August 15, 2019
This involves a no-confidence vote in Prime Minister Boris Johnson, extension to the Brexit deadline beyond October 31 and general election with him as temporary PM.
The SNP and Plaid Cymru suggested they could support the plan, while some Tory rebels indicated they would hold talks with Mr Corbyn.
But senior Tory Remainer Dame Caroline Spelman and the Independent Group for Change refused to support any Corbyn government.
![Jeremy Corbyn](http://image.assets.pressassociation.io/v2/image/production/99caa716ea5c5beed715a2276e4e5d8dY29udGVudHNlYXJjaCwxNTY1OTk2Mjcy/2.44669989.jpg?w=640)
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps also challenged Tory MPs to think very carefully about how they proceed in response to the unity government idea.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn accused of 'surrendering' on indyref2
He told reporters: “I think it’s absolutely extraordinary that any Conservative MP considered even for one minute installing Jeremy Corbyn in Downing Street.
“Jeremy Corbyn would wreck our economy, he would destroy jobs and the livelihoods, savings, I think he also can’t be trusted with security or crime and … I just think that any Conservative should think very, very hard about doing this. It actually presents a very clear choice.
“You either have Jeremy Corbyn as prime minister overturning the result of the referendum or Boris Johnson respecting the referendum, putting more money into the NHS, more police on the streets to keep us all safe.”
As the different Remain factions split over the issue, Mr Johnson used Twitter to repeat his Brexit plan.
He wrote: “The referendum result must be respected. We will leave the EU on 31st October.”
Conservative former ministers Dominic Grieve and Sir Oliver Letwin were among those to be contacted by Mr Corbyn.
I've written to the leaders of other political parties and senior backbenchers from across Parliament to lay out my plan to stop a disastrous No Deal Brexit and let the people decide the future of our country. pic.twitter.com/Jz1MjXCrqk
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) August 14, 2019
Mr Grieve said a national unity government led by Mr Corbyn is a “most unlikely way forward”, noting the Labour leader has views which are “entirely abhorrent” to him.
He said he was happy to speak to Mr Corbyn about ways in which they might “co-operate” to stop a no-deal Brexit, adding to the BBC: “Even for a short period a prime minister in a caretaker capacity has got to be somebody who can inspire trust – and such people do exist within the House of Commons and would be in a position to do that.
“I have to say that seeing Jeremy Corbyn’s history, it’s difficult to see how he could possibly be in a position to do such a thing.”
Parliament must legislate to stop no-deal. I don’t want a Johnson govt. I’d rather a truly national unity administration. But unless we can be *totally certain* of securing numbers for this, dissolving Parliament after 14 days hands Boris total power to crash out with no deal.
— Chris Leslie (@ChrisLeslieMP) August 15, 2019
Independent Group for Change MP Chris Leslie, formerly of Labour and a long-time critic of Mr Corbyn, said Parliament must legislate to stop a no-deal Brexit.
He added on Twitter: “I don’t want a Johnson govt. I’d rather a truly national unity administration.
“But unless we can be *totally certain* of securing numbers for this, dissolving Parliament after 14 days hands Boris total power to crash out with no-deal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel