Theatre
The Signalman
Oran Mor, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
five stars
On December 28th it will be 140 years since the Tay Rail Bridge disaster, when both the track and a passenger train plunged into the river below. Dundee Rep recently staged Peter Arnott’s Tay Bridge, which put persuasive flesh on dead bones. Now Oran Mor premieres what is an equally striking and effective companion piece: a monologue called The Signalman, in which – forty years after the tragedy – the signalman on duty that night relives events that have haunted him.
The narrative thread – developed from an original idea by actor Tom McGovern – is already vivid with dramatic horrors, but Arnott uses the facts to pick away at society’s culture of blaming and shaming. So even as McGovern (as the signalman, Thomas Barclay) re-enters that 1879 past, he’s providing contemporary parallels and the way the public – spoon-fed questionable details – seem abidingly unable to accept that accidents do happen... Someone has to be denounced as responsible. Was the violent storm that night an Act of God, sent to punish Sunday travellers? Or was the bridge itself unsafe? If so, who knew? Queen Victoria had trundled over the single-track spans just months before – albeit not in gale force winds.
As the memories flood back – not least of having to give evidence at the inquiry – McGovern’s whole body seems consumed by the storm that found the bridge wanting in resilient strength. He begins to question his every action as that 24-year old operative, taking us with him from the cosy regularity of his signalbox, out onto the pitch-dark track where he is at the mercy of the elements and his own all-engulfing fears. Every terrified stare, every shrinking in on himself, every rising inflection of panic at unseen perils appears innately real and in the moment to McGovern – and to us, too. Meanwhile director Ken Alexander’s instincts allow The Signalman’s emotional heft to build towards an ending that makes you want to weep.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here