The Supreme Court has ruled that Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks was unlawful.
– So what happens now?
The president of the UK’s highest court, Lady Hale, announced on Tuesday morning: “Parliament has not been prorogued.”
But the unanimous judgment of all 11 justices was that it was for Parliament – and particularly the speakers of both houses – to decide what to do next.
– What does Commons speaker John Bercow say?
In a statement released as soon as the court had given its ruling, Mr Bercow said the Commons must “convene without delay” and that he would be consulting party leaders “as a matter of urgency”.
READ MORE: Historic court defeat for Boris Johnson
He later announced he had instructed Parliamentary authorities to prepare to resume sitting on Wednesday.
– What did the party leaders say?
Tory party leader Boris Johnson did not react immediately. But he is at the UN in New York and it was 5.45am local time when the ruling came through.
No other ministers had any immediate reaction either.
But Jeremy Corbyn called for the PM to resign and brought forward his party conference speech to Tuesday afternoon so he could be back in Westminster by Wednesday.
LibDem leader Jo Swinson said the judges’ decision proved Boris Johnson was “not fit to be Prime Minister”.
READ MORE: Analysis: A 'remarkable' judgment made calmly, firmly and unanimously by the Supreme Court
And Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage called for the Prime Minister’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings to be sacked, adding: “The calling of a Queen’s Speech and prorogation is the worst political decision ever.”
– Where does it leave the Prime Minister?
The Supreme Court judgment is potentially embarrassing for Mr Johnson.
He might feel duty-bound to get back on a plane across the Atlantic to take charge of proceedings in the Commons but it would be a chastening experience to have to leave foreign leaders like Donald Trump and Angela Merkel to deal with a constitutional crisis of his own making.
The Tory Party could also decide to cancel its conference, which is due to start on Sunday and last until October 2, when Mr Johnson is scheduled to make the closing leader’s speech for the first time.
– Where does this leave Brexit?
Mr Johnson looked to be using Parliament’s suspension as an excuse to tour Europe in a bid to secure a better Brexit deal than Theresa May.
He made a trip to Luxembourg last week, met with senior European leaders in New York on Monday and talks in Brussels about altering the Northern Irish backstop are said to have accelerated.
Tuesday’s decision could put a spanner in the works, with Mr Johnson facing being tied down by regular Commons business, as well as having to answer MPs’ questions about the Brexit direction.
Then there’s the looming EU summit on October 17-18.
His brinkmanship strategy of pushing the negotiations as close to the October 31 deadline as possible looks to have become quite a bit more difficult for the PM.
– What about the rest of the political agenda?
The Government had insisted that prorogation was necessary to start afresh with new legislation from what is effectively a brand-new administration.
But the ruling that the suspension was unlawful means any unfinished Bills that were discarded in the wrap-up process can now come back into play – MPs expect to be able to debate the Domestic Abuse Bill, for example.
It will be business as usual in terms of the legislation being debated – but little else will feel anything like the same following the Supreme Court intervention.
– Does this bring a snap election closer?
Quite possibly. All the main party leaders have said they want one. They just can’t agree on the timing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel