A FEAR that bowel cancer is harder to treat than other cancers may contribute to lower rates of participation in screening for the disease, new research suggests.
Uptake of screening for bowel cancer is 59% among women aged 50 and over, compared to 77% for cervical and 72% for breast cancer in Scotland, the University of Glasgow study found.
They interviewed 59 women aged 51-64 who are eligible for all three screening programmes to examine reasons for the lower uptake of bowel cancer screening.
Some of those questioned felt they would notice if they had symptoms of bowel cancer and therefore thought they had less need of screening than for other types of cancer.
Participants who had not been for bowel screening said they feared treatment for it is more severe than for breast or cervical cancer and they would rather not know they had it.
One person interviewed said: "Sometimes I think I'd rather just not know and die, rather than be diagnosed with that and having a colostomy."
Dr Katie Robb, of the University of Glasgow, said: "What we thought was very interesting was that bowel cancer treatment was perceived as being more severe than breast or cervical, one woman was saying you can live without your breasts or have a hysterectomy but you wouldn't want to live with a colostomy bag.
"There was that idea that the treatment for bowel cancer is more severe than other cancers and they don't want to find out because they think the consequences of being diagnosed are so bad compared to breast cancer.
"There's much wider recognition that breast cancer can be treated and you can survive it but the public perception of bowel cancer is not quite there yet."
She added: "We know that screening can save lives because it detects it at an earlier more treatable stage.
"Often people don't appreciate that screening is for people who are asymptomatic so it can be detected at the earliest stages.
"Waiting for symptoms means it's probably at a more advanced stage so it's more difficult to treat."
Other people interviewed said they were worried about not doing the at-home test correctly, some felt disgust about doing it while some said it was easier to delay or forget about it compared to breast or cervical screening which involve going to an appointment.
In Scotland, since 2007, people aged 50-74 have been sent a self-complete faecal occult blood test every two years as part of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme.
To complete the test they have to collect two samples from each of three separate bowel motions and mail their completed kit for processing.
Women in Scotland are also invited to attend a pre-arranged appointment for breast screening and to make an appointment for cervical screening, with all three tests offered free on the NHS.
For the study, led by the University of Glasgow, researchers identified and interviewed women in Glasgow with different screening histories from different socioeconomic groups, some who took part in all three screening programmes, some who took part in just breast and cervical screening and some who did not participate in any.
The research, published in BMJ Quality & Safety, recommends steps that could be taken to increase participation in screening, such as working to reduce the fear around bowel cancer treatments and increasing awareness that screening is for those without symptoms.
Other suggestions include giving people a deadline to complete the test and trying to increase their confidence to carry it out themselves.
The research was funded by the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel