Labour leadership favourite and shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer has said Labour “should have taken a stronger position one way or the other” on Brexit.
Sir Keir said that people wanted “clarity” on the issue, which the Labour Party did not provide, and that not enough was done by the party to “knock down” the Tories’ Get Brexit Done message.
He added that, if he was to become Labour’s new leader, he would deliver the “fundamental change” needed to deal with inequality across the country.
Sir Keir said Labour lost the general election due to four main reasons which cumulatively caused the party to “lose the public’s trust”.
Speaking on Sky’s Ridge On Sunday, he said: “The issues, there were many of them, but they were the leadership, rightly or wrongly, fairly or unfairly, was coming up everywhere.
“The Brexit position and whether we were persuading people, more importantly, whether we were knocking down the Tories claim that they would get Brexit done.
“Anti-Semitism came up as a question of values and competence, and there was a general feeling that the manifesto was overloaded. They were the four main reasons.”
Sir Keir also outlined what a future Labour government led by him would look like, calling for more long term investment for businesses and the government and private sector to set green targets and requirements together.
He added: “I would like to see private schools as an irrelevant because the state sector was so good, and we’ve underfunded the state sector.”
But Labour shouldn’t throw away all of the ideas followed by Jeremy Corbyn, he said.
“What Jeremy Corbyn brought to the Labour Party in 2015 was the start of saying we should be anti-austerity and pro public services. That is right. We don’t want to throw that away.
“I’m not pretending we need to keep everything as it is, I’m not pretending there was anything good about that general election result, it was devastating, but we shouldn’t retreat from the radical… fundamental change is needed in this country and we must deliver it,” he said.
Discussing the problems with Labour’s Brexit position, Sir Keir added: “I think clarity about what your position is and not being able to say well would you be leave or remain after a general election was a problem and I made that argument but I accepted the decision.
“I think people wanted clarity and they wanted leadership.
“People had bought the idea that if you vote Tory you’ll get Brexit done and we didn’t knock it down hard enough.”
He also said the argument for a second referendum “blew away” with the election result and that the conversation must “move on” to the framework for future trade relations.
“We’re going to leave the EU in the next few weeks.”
He added: “It is inevitable that Boris Johnson and his Government will look to America for a trade deal, and we need to know the terms of that.”
Pressed on the situation in Iran, Sir Keir accused the Government of “blindly following the Americans” and not providing answers on whether President Donald Trump’s actions were lawful.
“This is a very serious situation and unquestionably blindly following the Americans is in my view the wrong thing to do.”
Asked if he would ever support military action, he added: “I would pass legislation that said military action could be taken if first the lawful case for it was made, secondly there was a viable objective, and thirdly we got the consent of the Commons.
“I think that legislation is much needed,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel