Local authority body Cosla has accused the Scottish Government of choosing to overlook funding for unprotected council services.
In a plea for more cash in this year’s Scottish budget, the organisation has warned increased ring-fencing means damage from cuts has been “amplified”.
Cosla said 60% of its funding must go towards specific schemes, leaving services such as public transport, sports facilities and environmental health at greater risk from cuts.
READ MORE: Cosla agrees to send controversial letter to teachers on pay deal
Cosla’s resource spokeswoman Gail Macgregor said: “Cosla’s vision is that Scotland’s communities are sustainable, vibrant places to live, work and visit.
“Every year, councils invest in a huge range of services and capital projects that are key drivers for economic growth.
“However, ring-fencing and Scottish Government-devised policy initiatives mean that more and more has to be delivered from an ever-decreasing portion of local budgets.
READ MORE: Cosla agrees to send controversial letter to teachers on pay deal
“The reality is that services such as roads, buses, paths, planning, community learning, events, sports facilities, libraries, tourism, business support and environmental health all sit unprotected.”
She added: “These services are what make our communities attractive places to live, work and visit.
“Local government’s role in creating sustainable communities cannot continue to be underestimated.”
In a brochure produced by Cosla for its Invest in Essential Services campaign, it cites research showing overall local government funding has dropped by 7% since 2013-14, compared to the 2% reduction in Scottish Government’s total revenue funding.
Local government currently receives a 33% share of the Scottish budget, down from 34.7% in 2013-14, it adds.
Cosla president Alison Evison said: “Local government is the sphere of government closest to Scotland’s citizens.
“Sadly, however, whichever way you want to dress it up, the reality is that in recent budgets the Scottish Government has chosen to overlook the essential services that communities rely on day in, day out.
“Our vision for Scotland’s communities depends on fair funding for council services.
“If we are to truly realise Scotland’s potential then local authorities must receive a fair settlement.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The failure of the UK Government to publish its budget at an earlier time means we do not have clarity on the funding available for our schools, hospitals and other vital public services.
“Despite this, we remain focused on introducing a Scottish budget for 2020-21 at the earliest practical opportunity, and are in discussions with Cosla on how we can support their budget process.
“Despite further cuts to the Scottish Budget from the UK Government, we have ensured our partners in local government receive a fair funding settlement – delivering a funding package of £11.2 billion for all local authorities in 2019-20, which is a real terms increase of more than £310 million.
“While ring-fenced funding is for increased investment in services such as our schools and nurseries, local authorities have complete autonomy to allocate over 92% – £10.3 billion – of the funding we provide, plus all locally raised income.
“Decisions on budget allocations for future years are subject to the outcome of the current negotiations with Cosla.
“The results will be confirmed as part of the Budget in due course.”
In response, a HM Treasury spokesman said: “Nothing stops the Scottish Parliament from passing their budget before the UK Budget.
“We are working with the Scottish Government as part of an agreed process to provide the information they need to prepare their budget.
“The Spending Round provided the biggest day-to-day funding settlement for Scotland in a decade, with the Scottish Government’s block grant increasing by £1.2 billion in 2020-21.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel