Stardust that formed up to seven billion years ago, and fell to Earth in a meteorite half a century ago, is believed to the oldest solid material ever found.
Stars are born when dust and gas floating through space find each other, collapse in on each other and heat up.
After burning for millions of years they die and throw particles that formed in their winds out in to space.
READ MORE: Scottish rocks reveal Ice Age which made 'boring' epoch cool
Those bits of stardust eventually form new stars, along with new planets and moons and meteorites.
Lead author Philipp Heck, a curator at the Field Museum, and associate professor at the University of Chicago, said: “This is one of the most exciting studies I’ve worked on.
“These are the oldest solid materials ever found, and they tell us about how stars formed in our galaxy.”
The materials examined in the study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences are called presolar grains-minerals formed before the Sun was born.
“They’re solid samples of stars, real stardust,” said Prof Heck.
However, presolar grains are tiny and rare, only found in about five per cent of meteorites that have fallen to Earth.
But the Field Museum has the largest portion of the Murchison meteorite, a treasure trove of presolar grains that fell in Victoria, Australia, in 1969.
Presolar grains for this study were isolated from the Murchison meteorite about 30 years ago at the University of Chicago.
The process involves crushing the fragments of meteorite into a powder.
Co-author Jennika Greer, a graduate student at the Field Museum and the University of Chicago, said: “Once all the pieces are segregated, it’s a kind of paste, and it has a pungent characteristic – it smells like rotten peanut butter.”
This “rotten-peanut-butter-meteorite paste” was then dissolved with acid, until only the presolar grains remained.
Researchers compared the process to burning down a haystack to find the needle.
Once the presolar grains were isolated, the researchers figured out from what types of stars they came and how old they were.
Exposure age data allowed the researchers to measure their exposure to cosmic ray.
By measuring how many of the new cosmic-ray produced elements are present in a pre-solar grain, scientists can tell how long it was exposed to cosmic rays, telling them how old it is.
The researchers learned that some of the presolar grains in their sample were the oldest ever discovered on Earth.
Based on how many cosmic rays they had soaked up, most of the grains had to be 4.6 to 4.9 billion years old, and some grains were older than 5.5 billion years.
But the age of the presolar grains was not the end of the discovery.
As presolar grains are formed when a star dies, they reveal the star’s history.
The researchers suggest that seven billion years ago, there was a bumper crop of new stars forming.
“We have more young grains that we expected,” said Prof Heck.
READ MORE: Scientists believe meteors may be striking Earth more frequently than thought
“Our hypothesis is that the majority of those grains, which are 4.6 to 4.9 billion years old, formed in an episode of enhanced star formation.
“There was a time before the start of the Solar System when more stars formed than normal.”
Scientists also found that presolar grains often float through space stuck together in large clusters like “granola”, something that had not previously been thought possible on that scale.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel