Contenders in the race to replace Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader have called for unity despite jostling for position in the first hustings of the campaign.
The event in Liverpool saw the major candidates battle for dominance in the contest which will see a new leader of the opposition announced in early April.
Left-wing would-be leader, shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey told the audience divided parties do not win elections.
Prominent backbench critic of Mr Corbyn Jess Phillips said the “name-calling within the party has been horrendous” and called for Labour to build a “broad team”.
Shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said Labour members should stop fighting each other and concentrate on attacking the Tories.
READ MORE: Richard Leonard urges Scots to “think courageously about the future"
Ms Thornberry said: “Being leader of the Labour Party in opposition is, quite frankly, the worst job in the world.
“That’s what we are applying for.
“In the end we have to wade through an awful lot of shit.”
Shadow Brexit secretary and early front-runner in the campaign, Sir Keir Starmer, agreed there had been “too much division”, adding: “We are unstoppable when we are united.”
Ms Phillips took a swipe at some her fellow contenders for keeping quiet over anti-Semitism in the party.
She said: “The Labour Party needs a leader who has spoken out against anti-Semitism, and other forms of harassment in fact.
“When others were keeping quiet and somebody who was in the room, struggling for an independent system – lots and lots of meetings – I have to say I don’t remember some of the people here being in that particular room or being in those particular fights.”
Ms Phillips said that the Labour Party’s handling of anti-Semitism had meant it had lost the “moral high ground” to fight racism.
She added: “Jewish people were scared of Labour winning the election.
“That’s deeply serious.
“The Labour Party has now lost the credibility to handle its own complaints system.
“We have lost the moral high ground to fight racism in this country because of the way we have handled anti-Semitism.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel