EMILY Thornberry, the Labour leadership contender, has issued a stinging criticism of her rivals Sir Keir Starmer and Rebecca Long-Bailey, branding them "machine politicians".
The Shadow Foreign Secretary took aim at the perceived front-runners in an interview with ITV News.
Ms Thornberry, who faces an uphill battle to remain in the contest, said there was a "squeeze" to get on to the ballot paper due to Sir Keir and Ms Long-Bailey dominating on opposing wings of the party.
She told the broadcaster's Calling Peston podcast that she suspected others in the race had been planning their leadership bids before December's disastrous General Election campaign had started.
"The truth is that I had a standing start, so I threw everything into the General Election and I started after the General Election. I don't think that's necessarily the case with everybody else," she declared.
"I started after the General Election and we now have two machines and we have two machine politicians; one on the Left and one maybe perceived to be on the Right. And there's a bit of squeeze going on."
Asked to confirm whom she was referring to, Ms Thornberry replied: "Rebecca on the Left and Keir on the Right."
Her comments come as Sir Keir, the Shadow Brexit Secretary, announced he would be cancelling Labour leadership campaign events in the run-up to the weekend because his mother-in-law was critically ill in hospital.
He will not take part in the union hustings organised by Unite on Friday as a result of the pause.
Sir Keir and Wigan MP Lisa Nandy are the only two of the four remaining candidates to have made it through to the final stage, having each been backed by at least two unions and one socialist groups representing at least five per cent of the total affiliated membership.
Ms Long-Bailey, the Shadow Business Secretary, is widely expected to secure nomination from Unite, an endorsement that could pave the way for her to reach the ballot stage.
Ms Thornberry, who represents Islington South and Finsbury, has yet to receive any union backing and is likely to need to secure nominations from 33 Constituency Labour Party branches - equivalent to five per cent of all CLPs - to ensure members and others can vote for her to be leader.
She currently has only three CLP nominations, meaning she must convince 30 more to back her before the February 14 deadline.
Despite facing difficulties in progressing, Ms Thornberry said she would not be following Jess Phillips's lead after the prominent backbencher threw in the towel and resigned from the contest earlier this week.
The Opposition frontbencher said she was "running to catch up" but would keep going because she was "popular" among the 500,000-strong membership who will decide the successor to Jeremy Corbyn on April 4.
A prominent member of outgoing leader's team, the London MP told the ITV podcast presenters she stood by the election manifesto's policies but criticised how they were presented to voters.
"We were announcing four or five policies a day. This is not the way you do it," she declared.
The 59-year-old argued that Labour could have won an election if it had taken place following a second referendum; a position she lobbied for within the Shadow Cabinet.
"We should never have had a general election," she insisted. "I argued really strongly that we shouldn't, I argued that we should have a referendum because a one-issue election is a referendum and we should have got Brexit done by putting Boris Johnson's deal, or any other deal which is viable, to the public."
Asked if Labour could have won a majority under Mr Corbyn following another poll on Europe, she replied: "Of course."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel