A FORMER SNP councillor, accused of sexual harassment, has dodged suspension despite warnings from a watchdog that him remaining in his role could potentially cause "harm to others” if the alleged behaviour is repeated.
Lewis Ritchie quit the SNP group at the City of Edinburgh Council in March 2018, before party bosses could discipline him - after being accused of sexually harassing two women.
READ MORE: Aberdeen councillor convicted of sexual assault suspended by watchdog
One of the complainants claimed Mr Ritchie tried to climb into her bed after a boozy night out at the 2017 SNP conference, while a party activist alleged he tried to kiss her in the back of a taxi after a party fundraising event.
He was also accused of punching a male colleague while in the back of another taxi at the 2017 party conference.
When the allegations emerged in February 2018, Mr Ritchie denied the claims – but admitted he had a drink problem.
Mr Ritchie remains an independent councillor after ignoring calls to quit and last year joined up with fellow SNP exiles Gavin Barrie and Claire Bridgman in forming the Edinburgh Party of Independent Councillors.
READ MORE: Anti-Semitism row MP Neale Hanvey says he feels 'tortured' by SNP suspension
The Ethical Standards Commissioner (ESC) is still investigating the allegations “of a serious nature...towards a number of individuals over a period of time”.
The Standards Commission has decided not to suspend him, partly over concerns about his "health and financial well-being".
In an interim report from the Standards Commission, the ESC warned that “there was a potential adverse impact on those affected by Councillor Ritchie’s conduct if he was allowed to continue to act as a councillor while the investigation was ongoing”.
But she added that “there was no suggestion, at this stage, that a suspension was required to protect witnesses or that cooperation with the investigation would be inhibited without a suspension”.
In response, Mr Ritchie said he “disputes the version of events” and claimed he was not acting as a councillor when the alleged incidents took place – at SNP conference and after a party fundraiser.
READ MORE: SNP councillor Lewis Ritchie quits party amid punch claims
According to the Standards Commission report, Mr Ritchie claims he has had “professional and positive interactions with councillors and council staff” and there have been “no complaints made in relation to his behaviour”.
The report adds: “Councillor Ritchie further advised that the imposition of an interim suspension could have a detrimental impact on his family and also on his health and financial well-being.”
But the Standards Commission panel has decided not to suspend Mr Ritchie while the investigation continues.
In her interim report, Lorna Johnson, chief executive of the Standards Commission, said: “The panel recognised that a failure to impose an interim suspension could potentially lead to harm to others, particularly if any of the conduct that was the subject of the allegations was repeated.
“The panel further recognised that public confidence in the ethical standards framework and a council itself can be adversely affected if elected members are allowed to continue to act while complaints of a serious nature are outstanding against them.”
READ MORE: SNP councillor Lewis Ritchie apologises over 'completely inappropriate' comment to female colleague
She added: “The panel noted, however, that the matters that were the subject of the complaint had occurred some two years previously, and that there was no evidence or suggestion that further complaints or concerns about Councillor Ritchie had been made or raised since then, despite him having continued in his role as an elected member and having attending council meetings.
“In addition, the panel accepted that the imposition of an interim suspension could have a detrimental impact on Councillor Ritchie’s health and financial well-being. The panel was satisfied there was insufficient evidence of a risk of substantive potential harm to others, that could outweigh this, if an interim suspension was not imposed.”
Mr Ritchie said: "I welcome the fact that the Standards Commission has chosen not to suspend me after looking into this case and I will be able to continue to represent my constituents at council.
"I have consistently denied these accusations, which are between two and four years old. As this matter has not yet concluded, I can make no further comment at this time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel