NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Jackson Carlaw of “grubby political opportunism” for his attacks on the Scottish Government’s coronavirus plans for schools.
The First Minister clashed with the Scottish Tory leader after she announced a new wave of lockdown changes at Holyrood.
Education Secretary John Swinney yesterday announced the Government was now aiming for a full-time return of schools in August, provided it was safe to do so.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Beer gardens in Scotland set to reopen on July 6
The Government’s initial plan for blended learning, a mix of face-to-face teaching and home schooling, was no longer the central assumption, but remained a back-up option.
Mr Swinney, who recently said it could take a year for schools to return to normal, was accused of a "screeching U-turn" in the face of parental outrage at children being offered as little as one day a week in class.
Citing the schools muddle, Mr Carlaw said the Government should get its message for reopening the economy clearer and give businesses adequate time to prepare.
He told FMQs: “We need crystal clear advice from government. We can’t have a repeat of the situation last week when pubs made preparations to open up outdoors only to be told it was all off.”
Ms Sturgeon said she had just given clear advice in her opening remarks, and the government was putting safety at the heart of everything it did.
She then went on: “Jackson Carlaw mentions schools. I think the debate on schools ums up the real problem at the heart of the approach Jackson Carlaw is taking.
“When it looked like full-time education would not be safe for children, we developed a contingency, but now that our progress against the virus makes it possible.
“It turns out that’s exactly what Jackson Carlaw asked us to do. Five days after we published the blended learning plan, the Conservatives published a paper in Scotland called Coronavirus and Scotland’s schools on May 26.
“It didn’t demand the return of full-time education, far from it. It called upon us, and I quote, to commit to flexibility on what happens in August.
"It asked us to report monthly from August 11 on the continued need for blended learning, and then it said, and I’m quoting again, only if evidence emerges that it would be safe to move faster to a full reopening should we do so.
“So what the Tories are criticising us for now, it turns out, is exactly what they called on us to do. I think that sums up Jackson Carlaw’s approach.
“It’s not leadership. It’s not putting the safety of kids and country first.
“It is, quite frankly, grubby political opportunism and no serious person should be indulging in that at a time of national crisis.”
Mr Carlaw replied: “It’s a bit disappointing that the First Minister relies on pre-scripted abuse from her advisers at First Minister’s Questions.
READ MORE: Two Scottish towns among the most in-demand seaside locations in UK
“I think it’s pretty clear what I asked the First Minister last week. Indeed, it’s pretty clear what other leaders in the parliament asked the First Minister last week.
“And it’s pretty clear last week she said I could do whatever made me happy, she wasn’t changing her plan. That was what she said. Six days later, a complete U-turn and I think that’s there for everyone to see.”
Mr Carlaw was referring to even more sulphurous exchanges at last week’s FMQs in which Ms Sturgeon accused him of being “incapable of rising to the challenge of a national crisis”.
She also said: “If Jackson Carlaw wants to continue just to snipe from the sidelines, then I will leave him to do that because I have hard work to do and I am going to get on with the hard graft of getting this country through coronavirus, doing that safely, and building the sustainable recovery that we all want.
“I’ll focus on that job and I’ll leave Jackson Carlaw to indulge in whatever makes him happy.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel