IN the midst of a pandemic, Brexit and a global recession, we are being bounced into a dispute with China, by a small clique of Tory MPs ("China warns of ‘consequences’ if Britain rejects Huawei 5G role", The Herald, July 7). China is a totalitarian state, which the West has coddled for decades, resulting in the greatest transfer of tech knowledge ever. Hong Kong was always going to revert to direct rule, and agitation for democracy has sped up the process.
The focus on security over Huawei is odd, given we are now aware of the CIA using a Swiss encryption company to spy on its supposed allies for the last 50 years. Espionage is endemic, and can be a deterrent for war.
The UK needs to trade: it needs a builder of nuclear power stations; expertise on high speed rail; tourists; purchasers of our goods. If Westminster bases trade on the conduct of every country, then there are few who would pass the test of democracy or respect for human rights in the present, never mind the past. It looks to me as if we are being used as a cat’s paw for the United States in their new “Cold War” with China, a dangerous game given the capricious nature of President Trump.
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
READING all the press recently about Huawei's participation in our communication network I fear that the lobbyists against Huawei are winning. I have not seen any proper analysis for and against their participation. The security empire is famous for exaggerating the risks of all sorts of things. It needs to do that to keep itself in business.
Although I am behind the times on computing I am aware of the costs of falling behind other countries. I am also aware of the tactics of the United States when it comes to trying to ensure that other countries are behind them. There are plenty of example through the years where they did everything in their power to stop projects which would threaten their superiority, for example Concorde. It would be nice if we had the expertise to go it alone but we do not. Let us ignore the US and cooperate with the Chinese.
Jim McAdam, Maidens.
I AGREE with Andrew McKie that we should stand up to China more ("We can afford to stand up to China more, and we should", The Herald, July 7 ), but not that “it’s hardly fair to attribute responsibility for diseases to the places where they happen to pop up in”. If it can be established beyond reasonable doubt that a disease with worldwide consequences has resulted from cultural or unhygienic practices which could be avoided, or if spread has been covered up: why not?
R Russell Smith, Kilbirnie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel