WHILE I occasionally write to The Herald, until now I have made it a point never to respond to other correspondents whom I consider to be entitled to their opinions, no matter how much I may disagree with them. However, I feel compelled to respond to Philip Adams (Letters, July 21), who stated that "National Lockdown 1 was a massive exercise in stupidity".
As I wrote last week, I have been closely involved in the response to the pandemic, in my case within sport. Far from it being an exercise in stupidity those countries which responded immediately to the crisis through imposing lockdown (for example, New Zealand) have come through the pandemic relatively unscathed, whilst others who delayed, including the UK, have suffered significantly, and as we can see in the United States and Brazil, continue to suffer through their failure to introduce and sustain a coherent lockdown programme.
I would be interested in knowing what Mr Adams's qualifications are that allow him to make such an ill-considered sweeping statement supported by absolutely no empirical evidence whatsoever, or does he belong to the Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro school of medical wisdom?
That I am saddened by such remarks is because to my mind they exhibit a lack of respect for those who have lost their lives through a failure of governance and for the many more who would have died, and may still yet if the actions currently in place are not enforced rigorously a key part of which was lockdown. Such actions are not, nor have ever been, a joke.
Bill Mitchell, Kyle of Lochalsh.
IT was good that Robert Howie (Letters, July 20) got a lot off his chest in his letter to The Herald.
Fortunately, the letter from Douglas Jardine which followed indicated why the people in Scotland should adhere to the actions recommended by FACTS and should wear a face mask at appropriate times (even if it is tartan).
By doing this, we lessen our chances of becoming one of the millions affected by this global pandemic.
Duncan Stirling, Cardross.
ON July 7 Nicola Sturgeon insisted she wouldn't be rushed into dropping quarantine restrictions on airport arrivals, preferring to follow the science and her advisers. On that day, Spain declared 347 new cases. The very next day she dropped quarantine for most countries apart from Serbia and Spain. Spain announced 383 new cases that day.
Yesterday, two weeks later, Spain reported a four-fold rise in new cases to 1,527 and Nicola Sturgeon dropped its quarantine restriction ("Quarantine lifted for arrivals from Spain – despite surge in cases", The Herald, July 22). Am I wrong in thinking her advisers are actually holidaymakers and opinion poll companies?
Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven.
WITH the pandemic now under some kind of control in Scotland, would it not be best now for the First Minister to stand down from her almost daily announcements? She could let a health expert take over the daily update, if it is deemed still necessary.
It seems almost as if she has grown to love the spotlight and coverage and will have to be dragged screaming and kicking from the podium and cameras. An announcement in Holyrood, where she can be questioned properly, seems much more fitting for the present situation.
Her daily pontificating long ago became a free, and unchallenged in any meaningful way, party political broadcast.
Alexander McKay, Edinburgh EH6.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel