TOMMY Sheridan has urged Alex Salmond to stand in next year’s Holyrood election as the head of a new pro-independence party.
The Solidarity leader said the former First Minister would “sweep up the votes” if he ran on the list in 2021.
Despite backing the new Alliance for Independence (AFI), Mr Sheridan said he wanted Mr Salmond to stand even if it sidelined other Yes forces.
“I would much rather see him do that than us have the ability to stand,” the former Glasgow MSP said.
A recent poll suggested a new party fronted by Mr Salmond could attract a quarter of the votes on the Holyrood list system, which returns 56 of Holyrood’s 129 MSPs.
READ MORE: The Alex Salmond trial is over but backlash yet to come
Mr Salmond resigned from the SNP in August 2018 after the Scottish Government held an in-house sexual misconduct into complaints against him made by two civil servants.
He won a judicial review at the Court of Session, forcing the Government to admit the probe was unfair, unlawful and “tainted by apparent bias”.
It led to a rift with Nicola Sturgeon, a split widened by him later being charged with sexual assault - he was acquitted on all 13 counts this March.
Since the trial he has been writing a book about his experience which he says will reveal evidence of a plot by Ms Sturgeon’s inner circle against him.
His supporters say he was the victim of a conspiracy to smear him and stop his return to frontline politics, where he could potentially rival his successor.
Standing in the election against Ms Sturgeon and her party could be the ultimate revenge, and capitalise on frustration in the Yes movement about a lack of progress on Indyref2.
One sign of that impatience is the emergence of the AFI, led by former SNP MSP Dave Thompson, which plans to field candidates on the Holyrood lists to maximise the number of Yes MSPs at Holyrood.
However the SNP has refused to withdraw from the list, and accused the AFI of trying to “game the system”.
Appearing on the pro-independence Scottish Prism podcast, Mr Sheridan said Solidarity had attended the first AFI meeting in February and considered the group had merit, and its first conference in September would be “worth participating in”.
But asked about what would happen if Mr Salmond entered the fray, he said there was “no doubt” that all the other small Yes parties would have to “take their tents down and go home”.
He said: “If Alex does that, then the rest of us can forget it, because he’ll sweep up the votes, quite rightly given his reputation for many many years.
“But do you know what? I’m calling on Alex to do it.
“I would much rather see him do that than us have the ability to stand.
“I don’t think us standing is a big deal for the independence movement.
“If nobody else is standing on that particular platform to utilise the voting system, to actually sweep up the second votes that otherwise would go to Unionists, then yes we’ll do it.
“But I would much rather Alex was prepared to do it because he will be more successful at it.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon's top official first to be grilled by Alex Salmond inquiry
Both Mr Sheridan and Mr Salmond currently work for Kremlin-funded propaganda outlets - Mr Sheridan for Sputnik news and Mr Salmond for the TV channel RT.
In its long-delayed Russia report, the Commons Intelligence and Security Committee last week said both state-owned outlets were guilty of “serious distortions” in their coverage.
James Kelly of the pro-independence Scot Goes Pop! website last week said he was sceptical about the AFI winning any MSPs, but said that Mr Salmond would probably win a large number of seats if he headed up a new list party.
“It would change the political landscape overnight,” he said.
Scottish Labour MP Ian Murray said: “Scotland deserves better than this discredited duo from the Kremlin’s propaganda channels.
“Next year’s election is too important to become the Tommy and Alex Show with their campaign to divide Scotland once again. The election must be about people’s jobs and supporting our NHS.”
Mr Salmond has refused to comment on political matters since his trial.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel