A Scottish pilot who was Vietnam’s most critically ill Covid-19 patient has warned others not to be “blase” about the risks of the virus.
Stephen Cameron was working for national carrier Vietnam Airlines when he tested positive for the coronavirus in March and went on to become seriously ill, spending 65 days on life support.
The 42-year-old, who became something of a media sensation in Vietnam as one of the country’s earliest and most critically ill patients, said the response of the country had been “mind-blowing”.
Speaking to BBC News, Mr Cameron, from Motherwell, North Lanarkshire, said the effects of Covid-19 should not be under-estimated.
READ MORE: Number of coronavirus cases worldwide tops 16 million
He added: “I’m a living example of what this virus can do and it is serious.
“People might grumble about having to put on gloves or social distancing two metres apart … but I contracted it and I was under for 10 weeks on life support.
“People can’t be blase about this until we have eradicated it.”
Mr Cameron said he was unsure if he would be able to walk again when he came round and was told that at one point he had only a 10% chance of survival.
He added: “When I first woke up I thought was I paralysed? I didn’t know if I was paralysed for life, because I couldn’t feel my feet.”
Mr Cameron said he thought it was “just incredible” that he gained such a following in the south-east Asian country.
He said: “The vast majority of the country knew about ‘Patient 91’, which was my moniker.
“On the equivalent of the 10 o’clock news they had somebody with my X-rays, my CT scans, my stats and actually talking through them in maybe a five-minute segment.
“I mean, that is a bit mind-blowing, if you think about it.”
READ MORE: BBC urged to drop Sturgeon's 'politicised' Covid briefings
He added: “When I left the hospital, there were people already queuing up at 8.30am to see me away, which I thought was just incredible.
“When we went through the lobby it must have been about 10-deep with people, everybody had their phones out.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel