THE actions of the co-pilot were “critical” in keeping a helicopter afloat after it ditched into the sea with the loss of four lives, an inquiry has heard.
Adrian Cope, a senior inspector with the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB), said “quick-thinking” co-pilot Adrian Bell was aware the aircraft was going down and managed to trigger the flotation bags before the crash.
Two crew and 12 passengers on board the Super Puma L2 survived when it ditched on its approach to Sumburgh Airport, Shetland, at 6.17pm on August 23, 2013.
But Sarah Darnley, 45, from Elgin, Moray, Gary McCrossan, 59, from Inverness, Duncan Munro, 46, from Bishop Auckland, County Durham, and George Allison, 57, from Winchester, Hampshire, died.
Mr Cope, who was involved in preparing the AAIB report into the crash, told the inquiry that recorded data “showed the helicopter was flying as you would expect it to right up till the last minutes”.
As the captain suffered a debilitating injury, co-pilot Alan Bell took the lead in helping those on board following impact. The fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into the crash is being heard virtually due to coronavirus measures.
Mr Cope told the FAI: “Prior to impact the co-pilot realised what was going to happen and he arms the flotation bags which is automatically triggered but they need to be armed by a push button. His awareness of the situation and quick thinking was really very crucial because that kept the helicopter on the surface, and we know from previous accidents then should the helicopter sink that is a very dire situation for all on board.
“That was the first of his actions that was critical. He was also aware there were release handles on the life raft.
“Some of the information he was aware of in terms of the release handles on the life raft made the process a lot quicker and smoother than it would have been had he not been present.”
Survivor Samuel Bull later took his own life in London in 2017, which Sheriff Principal Derek Pyle, who is hearing the inquiry, said was “directly caused” by the crash.
The inquiry also heard that none of the passengers were able to use the hybrid rebreathers they were provided with, which contain a small air supply with a gas canister which is triggered automatically when the person is submerged even if they are unable to take a full breath beforehand.
The hybrid rebreather differs from the standard rebreather, which requires someone to take a deep breath just before they are submerged and exhale into an air bladder which they can then breathe from through a mouthpiece once the valve is pulled out, and a full compressed air system like a scuba diving system.
Mr Cope said: “The findings we got from interviews with the survivors suggested there was a number of problems they experienced, mostly related to how rapidly the helicopter was submerged and the fact they had no warning of that, so there were a number of issues in terms of passengers unable to find the mouthpiece or release it from the cover in time, and others reported that they were submerged very quickly and didn’t have time to take a breath and so were unable to activate it.
“They were also unaware that this hybrid rebreather had an air supply associated with it so if they felt if they were not able to take a breath the system would be of no use to them.”
An AAIB report published in 2016 found that the pilots failed to properly monitor the flight instruments and failed to notice their airspeed was decreasing until it was too late to avoid the Super Puma plunging into the sea.
The inquiry continues today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here