Riders on the Storm
Alastair McIntosh
Birlinn, £9.99
Review by Rosemary Goring
Ecologist Alastair McIntosh’s latest work could not be more timely. The author of Soil and Soul, about the community buy-out of Eigg, has turned his attention to global warming. This original response to the problem is published only months after it was announced that the last decade has been the hottest on record.
Subtitled The Climate Crisis and the Survival of Being, Riders on the Storm is a multifaceted, occasionally dizzying analysis of the present situation and the arguments that rage over the planet’s urgent plight. Originally a geographer, McIntosh was raised on Lewis. This work is book-ended by his native heath, but the Hebridean influence on his awareness of the fragility of the natural world permeates every page.
Setting out the basic science in the opening chapters, McIntosh embarks on an ambitious, hard-hitting summation of the why, when, where and whither of environmental danger. He looks at those who question the evidence, such as the “climate sceptic” lobby group Global Warming Policy Foundation, headed by Baron (Nigel) Lawson. Of climate change deniers, he writes, “invariably, in my experience, they have been white, male and middle class, and I usually get the impression, unwilling to consider any restraint upon their lifestyles”.
At the other end of the spectrum are the scaremongers – not a term he uses – whose predictions are apocalyptic. Among this tendency, which includes Extinction Rebellion and eco-prophet Greta Thunberg, are figures such as Jim Bendell, who believes we’ll all be wiped out in 10 years. His manifesto, Deep Adaptation, includes passages such as: “When I say starvation, destruction, migration, disease and war, I mean in your own life ... You will become malnourished. You will fear being violently killed before starving to death ...”
As one climate physicist tells McIntosh, who is of a similar mindset, doomism and despair that exceeds the science is “extremely destructive and extremely influential ... Good scientists aren’t alarmist. Our message may be – and in fact is – alarming”.
Riders on the Storm offers a succinct scientific snapshot of the predicament, followed by lengthy and sometimes long-winded reflections on the spiritual dimension of coping with the consequences of our despoliation of the planet. It is this that makes it stand out from most other titles on the subject. McIntosh’s interest lies in looking beyond the facts, to the philosophical and religious dimension in which he frames the crisis. It was Carl Jung who said: “People who know nothing about nature are of course neurotic, for they are not adapted to reality.” In Jung’s day, nobody could have predicted the scale of our alienation from the natural world, yet he understood the defence mechanisms people put up to ward off threat and uncertainty.
There are echoes of Richard Holloway in McIntosh’s breadth of literary, spiritual and linguistic references, from song lyrics and poetry to the texts of the great world religions. Where he is most persuasive, however, is when he narrows the global picture to the socially and environmentally calamitous stories of Lewis, and of Papua New Guinea, where he worked for several years. When he brings leaders from the South Seas to Lewis, he witnesses the ways in which far flung parts of the planet, which might seem a world apart, are closely interconnected.
More spiritual guide than scientific manual, Riders on the Storm offers a profusion of ideas, written with insight, honesty and wit. Although McIntosh is a Quaker, his book is not restful or quiet, but it is prayerful. Of all its invocations to a deeper contemplation of where we stand and how we might react, TS Eliot’s lines from the Four Quartets, with which he opens the book, stand out: “Not fare well,/ But fare forward, voyagers.” What’s the alternative?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here