I HAVE friends who regularly march under one banner. They invariably return buoyed by the experience, surer than ever that independence is just around the corner. Hardly surprising, having spent the day with thousands of others of the same persuasion. Sure, it’s impressive, but they’re talking to the converted. What’s being done to win over the waverers whose support will be essential in a future referendum? When the undecided survey the current unedifying internal mix of squabbling, manoeuvring and personal grudges, they’re entitled to ask, “What’s going on here?”
The “once in a generation” tag attached to the 2014 referendum was always going to detach. As Harold Macmillan put it, “Events, dear boy, events,” will lead to a rerun sooner or later. Brexit, the pandemic and perceived incompetence and hostility at Westminster, are sufficiently significant events for the question to be asked again. The stakes will be incredibly high for unionists and nationalists alike. A prime minister who has lost most things, including credibility and grasp of reality will not wish to lose the Union.
Equally, a second referendum spells danger for nationalists. As Oscar Wilde nearly said, “To lose one referendum may be regarded as a misfortune, to lose both looks like carelessness.”
Both camps can learn from the ups and downs of separatism in Quebec. Although secession from Canada was heavily defeated in 1980, the rematch in 1995 was much closer. The demand for separation failing by less than 1%. Far from kicking on, the separatist cause declined at provincial and federal levels. The Bloc Quebecois (BQ) was nearly wiped out in 2015’s federal elections. Against the odds, it surged back in 2019, winning 32 seats in the House of Commons, effectively removing prime minister Justin Trudeau’s parliamentary majority.
The resurgence wasn’t necessarily down to renewed support for separatism. Dissatisfaction with Ottawa played a major part. Voting for BQ was a way to give the federal government a kicking. Quebeckers also felt their cultural identity and political institutions were insufficiently recognised and respected. Anything sound familiar?
Recent opinion polls suggest that, in Quebec as in Scotland, there are a great many waverers. Dissatisfaction with failing governments in Ottawa and London could well be the telling factor in winning over the undecided. A post-Brexit assault on devolution and a power grab by Westminster will play badly in Scotland, fuelling demands for independence. On the other hand, unionists can also learn from Quebec. In 2015’s federal elections non-secessionist parties promoted tactical voting, often putting up single candidates in marginal constituencies. That could be a high-risk strategy in Scotland but, in extremis, it might just be worth grasping the thistle.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel