A former Blue Peter presenter has gone on trial for allegedly sexually assaulting a woman at a Christmas party in London more than a decade ago.
John Leslie is accused of “grabbing” a woman’s breasts and laughing shortly after arriving at a party in the west end of London, a jury at Southwark Crown Court heard.
He denies sexual assault by intentionally touching a woman without her consent on December 5 2008.
Prosecutor Jocelyn Ledward said Leslie grabbed the complainant’s breasts “quite deliberately for a period of a few seconds” before walking off.
Ms Ledward said: “The woman was stunned but did not report it to the police.
“He (Leslie) denies he did any such thing and if there was any physical contact between them, then it must have been an accident.”
The woman had recognised Leslie at the bar and went over to him, the court heard.
He smiled at her, Ms Ledward said.
The prosecutor added: “She smiled back. Without saying anything further he grabbed both of her breasts with both of his hands and laughed as he did so.”
This went on for about three seconds, according to Ms Ledward.
She said: “The prosecution say this was no accidental touching but a quite deliberate sexual assault.
“The defendant laughed again and then walked off as if what he had done was completely acceptable and was not something anyone was going to challenge him on.”
The woman did not think her complaint would be taken seriously at the time but had confided in a friend who was left “shocked”, Ms Ledward said.
Only after the MeToo campaign became prominent in late 2017 did the woman decide to make a complaint.
Ms Ledward said: “She began to feel more angry about what had happened.”
Leslie voluntarily attended a police interview in March 2018 at the end of which he said: “I have not attacked or assaulted anyone ever,” the jury was told.
Leslie, who has an address in Edinburgh, stood quietly in the dock wearing a mid-grey suit as the jury was sworn in on Monday.
He appeared on Blue Peter between 1989 and 1994 and also presented Wheel Of Fortune and This Morning.
Everyone involved in the hearing was socially distanced.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel