It is not inevitable that parts of central Scotland will face tougher coronavirus restrictions this week, the Deputy First Minister has said.
John Swinney made the comments as the latest Scottish Government figures show 1,159 new cases of the virus were recorded in the last 24 hours.
This included 459 in Greater Glasgow and Clyde and 226 in Lanarkshire.
Both areas are currently in Level 3 of coronavirus restrictions, but Mr Swinney said on Friday they could move up to Level 4 – the highest tier – after a review of measures on Tuesday.
READ MORE: SNP must 'come clean' about independence economics as Blackford vows poll next year
Such a decision would see non-essential shops forced to shut, with bars, restaurants, gyms, hairdressers and visitor attractions also barred from opening – although schools would stay open
But speaking on the BBC’s Politics Scotland programme on Sunday, Mr Swinney said this was “not inevitable”.
“We are looking very carefully at all the data and having dialogue and discussions with local authorities,” he said.
He added that there is still “too much human interaction going on”.
While he said there is “very little evidence of the virus spreading within schools”, he suggested shopping, hospitality and household visiting could be responsible for the rise in cases.
Asked about the role of a vaccine in halting the pandemic, the Deputy First Minister said Scotland still faces a tricky period ahead.
READ MORE: Can the Greens really overtake Labour in Scotland? We ask co-leader Patrick Harvie
He said: “People think that maybe the battle is over because the vaccine is coming – well the battle is not over, believe you me, we’ve got a really tough period ahead of us, which is why we are looking at difficult decisions about level 4.”
The latest statistics on the virus show there are 1,241 people in hospital with Covid-19 and 100 patients in intensive care.
No new deaths were recorded in the last 24 hours and the death toll remains at 3,280, though figures from the National Records of Scotland suggest the true figure is 4,856.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel