A GROUP of Edinburgh businesses have failed in a legal bid to overturn a Scottish Government decision to keep the Scottish capital in level 3 of tough Covid regulations.
Roddy Dunlop QC told the Court of Session on Friday how the Scottish Government’s refusal to move Edinburgh into Level 2 was “unlawful” and “irrational” and placing companies at risk of “financial ruin.”
He told judge Lord Ericht that the rate of Covid 19 transmission figures is so low in Edinburgh that it should be placed in level 2.
Mr Dunlop, the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, said that according to the Scottish Government’s own guidelines, the city should move down a level.
However, he said that the Holyrood administration had ignored advice from its own public health officials recommending that the city be moved to level two.
Mr Dunlop said that the rate of Covid 19 transmission in Edinburgh was lower than other places in Scotland which are moving to a lower tier.
And he said that many Edinburgh based businesses are facing the prospect of going bust.
Mr Dunlop told judge Lord Ericht that he should order the suspension of the Scottish Government’s decision to keep Edinburgh in tier three.
However, lawyers for the Scottish Government argued that the Holyrood administration acted lawfully.
Advocate James Mure QC told the court that officials were concerned at recent increases in the numbers of people in Edinburgh suffering from the virus.
He also told the court that the government was worried about the number of people who could travel to Edinburgh over the Christmas holidays if the city was placed into level 2.
Mr Mure said the Scottish Government was concerned that the numbers of infections could increase and with this in mind, it had taken a lawful decision.
On Friday night shortly before 8pm, Lord Ericht agreed with Scottish Ministers and dismissed the case.
He said: “In my opinion they do not have a primae facia case. I refuse the petitioner's motion for interim suspension."
Mr Dunlop was speaking at a judicial review which had been brought to Scotland’s highest civil court by a group of businesses from Edinburgh.
The first petitioners in the case are a firm known as KLR & RCR International Ltd. The firm own the One20 Wine Cafe in the city’s Dundas Street.
Another petitioner includes Montpeliers Ltd, which owns pubs, restaurants and hotels.
KLR director Ronnie Reid previously won a judicial review at the Court of Session against City Council chiefs who tried to close his business earlier this year.
Mr Reid and his fellow group of businesses have gone to court over a decision made earlier this week by the Scottish Government.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced the capital would remain at level three due to concerns over Christmas shopping.
The First Minister told the Scottish Parliament: “The imminence of the Christmas period has also had an impact on our thinking.”
Mr Dunlop said the decision to remain in tier 3 so close to Christmas was putting businesses at risk of going under.
He added: “Keeping Edinburgh in level 3 creates a catastrophic situation for businesses in Edinburgh.
"The petitioner is the owner of the One20 wine cafe and he has seen his profits slump by 80 per cent.
“A statement from the directors of Montpelliers say that 25 per cent of their business comes in December.
“By staying in level 3 they are losing £30,000 per week.
“By moving into level two, they could break even - that’s all they are asking - is the ability to break even.”
Mure QC told Lord Ericht that the government had acted lawfully in making its decision to keep Edinburgh in level 3.
He said that there had been an increase in transmission of the virus in recent days and that this trend could continue in the run up to Christmas.
Mr Mure also told the court that for many Scottish people, Edinburgh was a popular destination for day trips. He said the Scottish Government was concerned that people could socialise and thus increase the numbers of people who contract the virus.
He added “As we have seen the scientific advisors are particularly concerned about the future at Christmas.
“So the decision is taken yes with having regard to the complex scientific advice and evidence and data along with all the other considerations including the magnet effect of all the facilities in Edinburgh in the run up to Christmas.
“In my submission my lord the petitioners cannot begin to satisfy the court that the decision taken was beyond the range of decisions reasonably open to the respondents.”
Lord Ericht agreed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel