COLUMNIST Boris Johnson complained that the National Lottery’s grant to purchase archives of his idol Winston Churchill was a waste of money.
The purchase had been controversial as Winston Churchill’s grandson, Winston Churchill MP, had been trying to flog the papers for decades even though some believed it already belonged to the state, as it related to wartime strategies and notes.
The documents were eventually bought using a £12.5m lottery grant by Churchill College, Cambridge.
Mr Johnson wrote in his Telegraph column in 1995 that lottery players had “sacrificed their smokes and their Crunchies to buy a ticket”.
He wrote: “Maybe the nation’s lottery punters... would have mourned if their collected stakes had not found their way into the pockets of Winston Churchill MP and socialite, who will receive £12.5 million to keep the papers in this country.
“Maybe they are all delighted, the millions in the lower income groups, the factory workers, the shop assistants, the unemployed, that Lord Rothschild’s fund has also decided to buy Mar Lodge in Scotland for the nation.
“But at least they can console themselves, their money was not entirely wasted! Just think! The nation has claimed the finest stalking estate in Scotland!”
Mr Johnson sarcastically said that it was “ a relief to learn that Sir Richard Rogers, deputy chair of the arts council, left the room when the council decided to give £980,000 to his Crystal palace design for the South Bank.”
Since becoming Prime Minister, Boris Johnson and his cabinet have faced questions over a chumocracy in Whitehall, with contracts and jobs relating to the coronavirus pandemic being awarded to those with close ties to senior government ministers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel