A SENIOR SNP MP has been accused of "irresponsible" and "insulting" remarks after arguing a second referendum is not the only route to independence.
Joanna Cherry QC said Ireland shows part of the UK can leave without such a vote, but insisted "no-one wants to replicate the violence that preceded those negotiations".
A virtual SNP national assembly is set to discuss “the tactics and strategy on the route from here to Independence Day” later this month.
READ MORE: Tom Gordon: Boris Johnson's ‘unsustainable’ block on Indyref2 is here to stay
Ms Cherry said she agreed a "legal and constitutional way to demonstrate that public opinion in Scotland has changed since the 2014 referendum" must be found.
She said the "easiest and best way to do that" would be to replicate the referendum held in 2014.
However she questioned what would happen if Prime Minister Boris Johnson continued to refuse this.
Writing in The National, she said: "It is foolish and dangerous to rail against having a plan to do things differently, should it be required."
The Edinburgh South West MP added: "Dangerous, because it reinforces the power of our adversary and cements in the minds of the international community that the only way Scotland can leave the UK and become independent legally and constitutionally is by replicating the 2014 referendum.
"This is patently not true. One hundred years ago, Irish independence came about not as a result of a referendum but as a result of a treaty negotiated between Irish parliamentarians and the British Government after nationalist MPs had won the majority of Irish seats in the 1918 General Election and withdrawn to form a provisional government in Dublin.
"While no-one wants to replicate the violence that preceded those negotiations, the Treaty is in legal and constitutional terms a clear precedent which shows that a constituent part of the UK can leave and become independent by a process of negotiation after a majority of pro-independence MPs win an election in that constituent part."
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon previously told activists there are no "shortcuts or clever wheezes that can magically overcome the obstacles we face".
Speaking in January last year, she ruled out a consultative referendum in defiance of UK Government opposition in the short-term, as it was legally uncertain.
However she said she did not rule it out forever if the UK kept blocking another referendum.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon urges Yes supporters to be patient on second Scottish independence referendum
Ms Sturgeon's strategy has focused on building support for independence, arguing it is "unsustainable" for the UK Government to continued to block another vote.
But some activists have expressed frustration with this approach.
Mr Johnson recently suggested a second referendum should not take place until the 2050s.
Pamela Nash, chief executive of pro-UK campaign group Scotland in Union, criticised Ms Cherry's remarks.
She said: “These are irresponsible remarks from a leading SNP figure and Nicola Sturgeon should distance her party from these comments.
“The comparison with what happened in Ireland over 100 years ago is insulting.
“Ignoring the views of the people of Scotland and leaving the UK by the back door would be a democratic outrage.
“The SNP should drop its obsession with how to divide our nation and work on bringing people together to rebuild our economy and public services.”
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel