A Russian court has opened the trial of a feminist activist and artist charged with disseminating pornography after she shared artwork depicting female anatomy online.
The case is in line with the Kremlin's conservative stance of promoting "traditional family values" that has been widely seen as controversial and elicited international outrage.
Yulia Tsvetkova, 27, from the far-eastern city of Komsomolsk-on-Amur, faces up to six years in prison on charges reportedly related to her group on the popular social network VKontakte, where colourful, stylised drawings of vaginas were posted.
Tsvetkova is not allowed to give details of accusations against her.
The first hearing in the Komsomolsk-on-Amur court on Monday comes a year-and-a-half after Tsvetkova was first detained, and eight months after Russian President Vladimir Putin signed constitutional amendments that outlawed same-sex marriage and tasked the government with "preserving traditional family values".
Tsvetkova's lawyer, Irina Ruchko, told reporters after the hearing that Tsvetkova maintains her innocence and that her defence team intends to prove it in court.
Tsvetkova ran a children's theatre and was a vocal advocate of feminism and LGBT rights.
She founded an online group, called Vagina Monologues, encouraging followers to fight stigma and taboo surrounding the female body, and posted other people's art in it.
Amnesty International last week called the case, which is being heard behind closed doors, "Kafkaesque absurdity" and urged Russian authorities to drop all charges against the activist, who was merely "freely expressing her views through art".
Tsvetkova's mother, Anna Khodyreva, echoed this sentiment in an interview with the Associated Press and said that the court should dismiss the case.
"Yulia has always been against pornography... Feminists are against pornography because it's exploitation of women's bodies," she said.
Tsvetkova was detained in November 2019 and spent the next four months under house arrest.
Her home was raided, as well as her mother's education studio for children.
The activist was fined twice for violating Russia's law against disseminating gay "propaganda" to minors.
The court ordered Tsvetkova to pay a fine of 50,000 roubles (£470) in December 2019 for running an LGBT-themed online group, and 75,000 roubles (£705) more in July 2020 for a drawing in support of LGBT families.
The second fine was later decreased to 50,000 roubles.
Many public figures have spoken out in her support, including Russian state TV veteran Vladimir Pozner.
Activists across Russia protested over her prosecution, artists dedicated performances to her, and an online petition demanding to drop the charges gathered more than 250,000 signatures.
The European Union's delegation to Russia said in a tweet last week that the bloc "is closely following" the case against Tsvetkova and that "apparently, her persecution is related to her public position as an LGBT activist".
The delegation called on Russian authorities to stop the prosecution of the activist.
The past two years have been an ordeal for both Tsvetkova and her mother.
As well as the pressure from the authorities, they say they received death threats and were repeatedly harassed by strangers.
Ms Khodyreva's education studio for children has lost a vast number of clients.
Tsvetkova's children's theatre no longer exists - frequent visits from law enforcement were too distressing for the children, and it was decided to shut it down, Ms Khodyreva said.
"It is terrifying. I'm still looking back at the door even now," Ms Khodyreva told the AP.
"The police have barged in so many times that ... I'm not ready to have the children involved in this mayhem."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel