THE refurbishment of Boris Johnson’s flat and the court of King Boris continued to be debated by columnists in the newspapers.
The Daily Express
Ann Widdecombe believes the Prime Minister was an ‘ass not to have said “no” when Carrie moaned that perfectly adequate accommodation did not suit her modern taste.’
But she thinks it pales into insignificance compared to the issues surrounding the inconsistencies in lockdown policy.
“He should, of course, have declared it but it is still a sideshow compared to the real drama, which is a collapsing economy under increasingly unnecessary restrictions,” she said.
“There never was any good reason to limit funerals to 30 persons. The deciding factor should have been the size of the church or crematorium and its ability to accommodate social distancing, which is the criterion used for normal church services.
“The vaccination policy has been a roaring success and were Boris really following the data not the dates we would now be almost back to normal. Yet still he cowers in his bunker. That is the real scandal.”
The Guardian
Rafael Behr said No 10 has always had informal cliques and “kitchen cabinets” but the current situation is unprecedented.
He said there were three reasons for it - Brexit and Boris Johnson burning all his bridges in securing it, lockdown and the surrender of power on a scale unknown outside wartime with business done casually ‘in the VIP contacts lane, and Johnson’s character.
“The prime minister approaches truth the way a toddler handles broccoli,” he said.
“He understands the idea that it contains some goodness, but it will touch his lips only if a higher authority compels it there.
“The court of King Boris combines the zealotry of a revolution with the conceit of an empire and the probity of gangsters. It is hard to predict how long such a regime can last.”
The Independent
Andrew Grice said Number 10’s carefully worded statement that Johnson has paid in full [for the refurb] deliberately avoids whether someone else footed the bill before he did.
“For me, this conjured up an image of Downing Street officials working out how to try to defuse the story without telling a porkie,” he said. “
“Indeed, ministers who regard themselves as Johnson allies worry his failure to register a possible £58,000 donation or loan he received last July within a month as required under the rules, could land him in trouble with Kathryn Stone, the parliamentary commissioner for standards.
“It would be much better for Johnson to reveal where the money for the flat refurb initially came from and doing something that never comes naturally to him – making a grovelling apology.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel