GLASGOW'S level three purgatory finally ended on Saturday and with the drop to level two came a return of my three favourite things: cinema, the beach and hugging.
Tomorrow I'm hitting up Troon. I don't care if the weather breaks and a cyclone whirls itself anticlockwise across Ayrshire - my toes are going in the Firth of Clyde.
Had a wee cinema trip on Sunday with more booked in for this week. A seat in the dark with an enforced phone ban and a big, silly story reeling out on a big, shiny screen - glorious.
But in level two I'm mostly here for the hugging. I've been banging on for the past 15 months about wanting to hug my mum again. It's been awful having to keep a strict distance all this time and the anticipation of being able to give her a wee squeeze has been motivation to keep going through all the restrictions.
I've never fancied myself a hug obsessive. On a scale from Jacob Rees-Mogg ("I'm not really a touchy-feely person") to Joanna Lumely, who said she'd hug anything that moved, I'm somewhere in the middle.
After a year of distanced living, I want nothing but full body squeezes, a bit breathless, slightly overly-long. Just some hugs man. I feel so starved of human contact I'm in danger of licking my friends when I see them.
Recently, I was interviewing the CEO of a charity over video call and we were having a wee whine about Zoom fatigue. One thing led to another and we got to talking about what the end of lockdown will mean for single people and the resumption of dating.
According to recent reports, condom sales have been soaring over the past few months. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has joined forced with dating ups to try to boost the uptake of vaccinations in the under-30s by giving those who add their vaccination status to their profile a few, um, extra benefits.
If you're on Tinder, Match, Hinge, Bumble, Badoo, Plenty of Fish, OurTime or Muzmatch - some will be on all of the above - then you'll get "boosts", which promote your profile to potential dates.
Apparently, this is to be the "summer of love".
My desires feel much more innocent in comparison. It will be interesting to see how a year of a lack of contact affects dating. Will people veer away from apps as they crave immediate face-to-face interactions? Will it become common again to be chatted up in person, rather than online?
Over the past year, the importance of human contact has become every more plain. Some hug refuseniks will have felt utter relief as physical distancing meant the end to unwanted touch - no more unwelcome hugs, or pats on backs or arms around shoulders.
But for many others, touch is vital. Apparently hugs activate pressure receptors that help slow down the nervous system and reduce production of stress hormones. They just make us feel... better.
During the pandemic there were heartbreaking images of people holding one another through specially adapted plastic shower curtains, using arm holes and gloves, such was the need for some semblance of touch.
England, Wales and other parts of Scotland have had hugging back on the cards for a wee while now but it seems that people are still, rightly, proceeding with caution. We were, after all, told to embrace "cautious hugging", which presumably means don't lick your pals and try to keep the hug recipients to a minimum.
Will hugging ever return to pre-pandemic levels? There needs to be a whole new etiquette developed to deal with close contact. A way of politely saying yay or nay to hugs and offering an alternative. Or nothing at all. I'm hoping for an end to the elbow bump, personally. It's too politicians-trying-hard for my liking. Anything dubbed the "Boris bump" should not be granted the dignity of longevity.
Cut to Saturday and the big moment was finally here. I drop my bags on the floor, take a step forward and smoosh with abandon. There is a shriek in response, part delight, part horror. I'd say a 70/30 split to the latter.
I step back. "That was a bit much," she says.
Oh well. I'm clearly out of hugging practice but fingers crossed there's plenty of time left to get it right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here