“IT was good to see Lord Hailsham in Glasgow yesterday. We don’t often get the chance to go stark, staring bonkers over a visiting Tory dignitary. So wrote Colm Brogan in Floater, this paper’s General Election diary, in September 1974. Predictably, the former Lord Chancellor had weighed in on the endless devolution debate and, just as predictably, rejected it, declaring that separation would be disastrous for Scotland, England and Wales.
He said that all the countries of Britain seemed to have lost the visions that had made them a great, forward-looking people. They were now torn by divisions.
We could not, he added, turn our backs of 250 years of successful co-operation.
Hailsham, who is pictured feeding the pigeons in George Square during his flying visit, said that the breaking-up of the UK would render the British people poor, inefficient, parochial, and despised in the world.
“I believe if we had come to terms with devolution at the time of the Gladstone Home Rule bill we would never have seen the partition of what was then the UK, and we would never have had the split in the British Isles which I deplore but must accept.”
Hailsham, however, could seemingly turn his back on less than 100 years of history, said Brogan.
“For yesterday he was insisting that had we only listened to Gladstone and the good sense of that Prime Minister’s views on devolution and home rule, we would now have none of this silly nationalist nonsense.
"A pity that Gladstone was about the most famous Liberal ever (leaving aside the dog-food salesman [Sir Clement Freud].
"A pity that it was Gladstone who began the Liberal Party tradition of federalism, which the present lot are so painfully reminding us has been central to party policy since Asquith first appeared.
"Otherwise, quite a good performance, Lord Hailsham,” Brogan concluded.
Tomorrow: Hailsham at Glasgow University in 1960
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here