One of the Netherlands' best-known crime reporters is fighting for his life in hospital after being shot in Amsterdam.
Peter R de Vries, who has been widely lauded for his fearless reporting on the Dutch underworld, was shot in the capital after making one of his regular appearances on a current affairs television show.
It was an unusually brutal attack on a journalist in the Netherlands.
Mayor Femke Halsema said: "Peter R de Vries is for all of us a national hero, an unusually courageous journalist, tirelessly seeking justice.
"Today, justice in our country appears a long way off. A brutal, cowardly crime has been committed."
Police chief Frank Paauw said two suspects had been detained, "including a possible shooter", after a suspected getaway car was stopped on a major road around 30 miles south of the city.
A third suspect was detained in Amsterdam, he said.
There was no immediate word on a motive.
Mr de Vries had long been considered a possible target of the criminals he reported on.
Police and prosecutors declined to comment on whether the 64-year-old reporter had received police protection.
The Netherlands' caretaker prime minister Mark Rutte called the shooting "shocking and incomprehensible".
He said: "An attack on a courageous journalist and also an attack on the free journalism that is so essential for our democracy, our constitutional state, our society."
Mr de Vries had recently been acting as an adviser and confidant to a witness in a major trial of the alleged leader of a crime gang police described as an "oiled killing machine".
The suspected gangland leader, Ridouan Taghi, was extradited to the Netherlands from Dubai in 2019.
He is currently in jail while he stands trial along with 16 other suspects.
King Willem-Alexander and his wife Queen Maxima tweeted a message of support, and said that "journalists must be free to carry out their important work without threats".
Mr de Vries won an International Emmy in 2008 for a television show he made about the disappearance of US teenager Natalee Holloway while she was on holiday in the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba in 2005.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here