Madelene Sagstrom was reduced to tears after being involved in a controversial incident which marred a superb first day for Europe in their defence of the Solheim Cup in Toledo.
Catriona Matthew’s side ended the day with the three-point lead they had earned from the morning foursomes, but all the talk afterwards was of what happened in the first afternoon fourball match.
Nelly Korda’s eagle putt on the 13th hole at Inverness Club stopped on the edge of the hole, but her ball was swiftly picked up by Sagstrom, conceding a birdie.
However, Sagstrom was deemed to have not waited long enough and world number one Korda was credited with an eagle to win the hole and move one up.
Under Rule 13.3, if any part of the ball is overhanging the lip the player is allowed a ‘reasonable time’ to reach the hole and then 10 seconds to see if the ball would drop.
Sagstrom, playing partner Nanna Koerstz Madsen and Matthew argued that the ball was not going to drop in, but the ruling of the on-course official was confirmed.
Korda and Ally Ewing went on to complete a narrow victory on the 18th, after which a visibly upset Sagstrom told Sky Sports: “Obviously I wasn’t following the rules about leaving the ball for 10 seconds, but I do believe in integrity and honour of the game of golf and I would never pick up a putt that had a chance to go in.
“I personally don’t agree with the decision with the ball being on the edge, but I didn’t follow the 10-second rule, so it sucks right now because I feel like I let my team down.”
Madsen said spectators were “yelling terrible stuff” at Sagstrom in the wake of the incident, adding: “It was just not fun for Madelene to be in that position.
“I think she felt bad, and she really shouldn’t. Golf shouldn’t go down to a putt that would never have gone in. She didn’t do anything.”
Korda described the situation on the 13th as “very unfortunate” and said the American pair had not asked for a ruling.
“By the time I got off the green they were reviewing everything and we honestly had no say in it. It was all up to the rules committee, “Korda said.
“It feels weird, obviously, but they did the best that they could with the situation that they had at hand.”
Anna Nordqvist and Matilda Castren had already beaten Lexi Thompson and Mina Harigae 4 and 3 to secure a second point of the day following a foursomes win over Danielle Kang and Austin Ernst on the 18th.
And after Lizette Salas had birdied the 18th to give herself and Jennifer Kupcho victory over Carlota Ciganda and Sophia Popov, Georgia Hall and Leona Maguire defeated Yealimi Noh and Brittany Altomare on the last.
In the morning foursomes, Mel Reid and Leona Maguire had overcome the previously unbeaten Korda sisters, who won 6 and 4 and 6 and 5 in the same format at Gleneagles in 2019.
“I couldn’t have asked for a better start to my Solheim career,” Maguire said. “Very lucky to have Mel alongside me.
“I think everybody had written us off today, and we just sort of took that in our stride and wanted to be as relentless and fearless as possible, and I feel like we did that.”
Reid was quick to pay tribute to her playing partner, adding: “Honestly I could not be more impressed with this girl.
“She’s some player and I’m just really, really proud of the way she handled herself and she’s a very, very impressive girl, so it was an honour to play with her in the first match.”
The home side looked set for a win when Ewing and Megan Khang were two up with two to play against Hall and Celine Boutier, who were unbeaten at Gleneagles in 2019.
However, Hall holed from 15 feet for birdie to win the 17th and a par was good enough on the last to snatch half a point, Ewing failing to hit the hole from three feet with a putt to win the match.
And there was even more good news in the final match as Charley Hull and Emily Kristine Pedersen recovered from two down with four to play to beat Thompson and Brittany Altomare on the last.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here