A man on trial for terrorism offences discussed livestreaming “an incident” and said he wanted the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon “to die” in an online pro-fascist forum, a court has heard.
Sam Imrie has been charged with posting statements on social media platform Telegram suggesting he was going to carry out an attack on the Fife Islamic Centre in Glenrothes, Fife.
The 24-year-old has also been accused of planning to stream live footage of “an incident”.
Giving evidence at the High Court in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Detective Constable Jonathan Leitch, who works in counter-terrorism, discussed messages allegedly posted by the accused in a Telegram channel called “Fashwaveartists.”
In a series of posts in July 2019, Imrie allegedly wrote: “I just want them all dead. I just want my people to live free.
“I don’t give a f*** who I have to kill to make it happen. I will meet them at the door with closed fists, ready to fight.
“I’m tired of being nice, I want to atom bomb all of the Middle East and all of Africa. F*** all you n******.
“I want to stream it but I also don’t want to get caught. I think I will stream it though. We are going to kill the invaders.”
Imrie also allegedly hit out at the SNP over their immigration policies.
“The SNP Party wants millions of Muslims to come in so obviously I want Sturgeon to die,” he allegedly wrote.
The court heard that on July 5 2019, the accused posted a series of images and videos of the Fife Islamic Centre, a green petrol can and a fire at a building in the online group.
He allegedly began the posts with the words: “Sorry we can’t be friends, it’s time to rise.”
Imrie had previously been accused by other in the group of being a “fed” or “cop”, and was warned not to discuss his plans on the app.
At 4.15pm he posted two photos, one of a green petrol can in the passenger seat of a car, another of the Fife Islamic Centre, the court heard.
On seeing the images, Detective Constable Jonathan Leitch told the court: “I would assess that to be the Fife Islamic Centre.”
Imrie’s posts continued: “Amimals have their windows barred like a zoo. I’m heading to location 2. Updates in 15 mins (sic) or so.”
He followed this by saying: “We will kill all n******”.
In total the accused posted five videos of the centre, the last appearing to show a fire being started outside the building.
Imrie posted: “Just smashed a car recording this, nearly there. Too late to go back, we will kill them all.”
Other posts allegedly made by the accused at that time said: “Filthy c**** get out of my homeland”; “The trees and bushes should keep it burning, I’m driving home”; and “We will kill every s***skin”.
When another user asked what the video was showing, the court heard that he replied: “That’s the Islamic centre next to the woods, retard. I’m going to jail.”
The accused was earlier warned by other users not to discuss the issue in the group.
He responded: “There is no going back. Any chance I actually get away with it?”
Other users appeared to try to dissuade the accused.
One said: “Throwing you life away doesn’t make you a martyr, especially when you throw it away on a whim.
“Targeting innocents at this stage will only harm the rest of us.”
Imrie is said to have replied: “No invader is innocent.
“F*** it, why wait? Hypothetically if I was going to livestream something cool, where should I do it?”
Among other charges, Imrie has been accused of being in possession of neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim material and extreme pornography, including indecent images of children and an image involving a human corpse.
Imrie is also charged with driving while under the influence of drugs and alcohol in July 2019.
He denies all of the nine charges against him, three of which come under the Terrorism Act.
The trial, before Lord Mulholland, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article