A camera operator told authorities that Alec Baldwin had been careful with weapons on the set of the film Rust before the actor shot and killed a cinematographer with a gun he had been told was safe to use.
Court records show cameraman Reid Russell told a detective that Baldwin was rehearsing a scene on Thursday in which he was set to draw his gun while sitting in a church pew and point it at the camera.
The camera was not rolling when the gun went off, killing cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, Russell told police.
Authorities said on Friday that the assistant director, Dave Halls, had handed the weapon to Baldwin and announced "cold gun," indicating it was safe to use.
When asked about how Baldwin treated firearms on the set, Mr Russell said the actor was very careful, citing an instance when Baldwin made sure a child actor was not near him when a gun was being discharged.
The affidavit also includes statements from director Joel Souza, who was standing behind Mrs Hutchins and was wounded.
It detailed the moments before the shooting and shows that there was disruption on the set the day of the shooting.
Several members of the camera crew walked off the production in a dispute over payment and how far away from the set their lodgings were, Mr Russell said, and he was left with a lot of work to do.
Only one camera was available to shoot the scene, and it had to be moved because the light had shifted and there was a shadow.
He said he was unsure whether the weapon was checked before it was handed to Baldwin.
Souza said that he was focused on how the scene would appear on camera. He said he recalled hearing the phrase "cold gun" being used before the incident and that the scene they were shooting did not call for the use of live rounds.
Souza described the gunshot as sounding like a whip and a loud pop.
On Sunday, a crew member who worked with Halls on another project said she had raised safety concerns about him in 2019.
Maggie Goll, a prop maker and licensed pyrotechnician, said in a statement that she filed an internal complaint with the executive producers of Hulu's Into The Dark series in 2019 over concerns about Halls' behaviour on set.
Ms Goll said Halls disregarded safety protocols for weapons and pyrotechnics and tried to continue filming after the supervising pyrotechnician lost consciousness on set.
Halls has not returned phone calls and email messages seeking comment.
"This situation is not about Dave Halls... It's in no way one person's fault," Ms Goll said. "It's a bigger conversation about safety on set and what we are trying to achieve with that culture."
The film's chief electrician Serge Svetnoy blamed producers for Mrs Hutchins' death in an emotional Facebook post on Sunday.
Mr Svetnoy said he had worked with Mrs Hutchins on multiple films and blamed "negligence and unprofessionalism" among those handling weapons on the set. He said producers had hired an inexperienced armorer.
Hollywood professionals say they are baffled by the circumstances and production crews have quickly stepped up safety measures.
Jeffrey Wright, who has worked on projects including the James Bond, was acting with a weapon on the set of Westworld when news broke of the shooting and said: "I don't recall ever being handed a weapon that was not cleared in front of me - meaning chamber open, barrel shown to me, light flashed inside the barrel to make sure that it's cleared. Clearly, that was a mismanaged set."
Actor Ray Liotta agreed with Wright that the checks on firearms are usually extensive.
"They always - that I know of - they check it so you can see," Liotta said. "They give it to the person you're pointing the gun at, they do it to the producer, they show whoever is there that it doesn't work."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel