SCOTLAND can beat a team who can beat South Africa: they showed that against Australia eight days ago. What they cannot do is beat South Africa themselves. Not yet anyway.
The Springboks were convincing winners in the end on Saturday, defeating the home side 30-15 at BT Murrayfield. But, for all their domination of the scrum throughout, and their mastery of the lineout for long stretches of the contest, they only pulled away in the last dozen minutes, when three penalties eased them clear.
Given the final score and the evident difficulties in the set piece, it might have been tempting for Scotland supporters to feel despondent. But, with a final Autumn Nations Series game to come on Saturday against Japan, no such luxury is available to the players themselves.
Sam Skinner, for one, is confident that the problems exposed or created by South Africa can be sorted out in short order. The lock forward believes that Scotland were less impressive in many respects in victory against the Wallabies - who beat the Springboks twice in the Rugby Championship - than they were in defeat at the weekend. And he is convinced that this squad are capable of defeating the world champions, whom they will meet in the pool stage of the next Rugby World Cup.
“We are close, really close,” the Exeter second-row said. “We’ve beaten Australia last weekend – and I genuinely believe we didn’t really get out of the blocks [in that match].
“We’ve put in a better performance against South Africa, for sure. We are close. We are playing at the top level. Small margins have a big impact in the game.
“We’ve got two years to keep building for the World Cup. We honestly couldn’t ask for a better squad, better coaching staff, or better facilities.
“It’s all there for us. We’ve just got to stay ruthless with our mentality and keep improving.”
It would be easy to say that Scotland’s problems were self-inflicted, particularly late in the second half when some of the decision-making verged on the desperate. But playing against a team such as the South Africans will always take its toll on your mental energy as well as your physical energy, so the quality of the opposition has to be factored into any assessment of your own shortcomings. Skinner acknowledged as much, but insisted that his team had it in them to get the better of the Boks.
“At times, we could maybe have kept it a bit simpler for ourselves. But that’s just hindsight, isn’t it? It’s easy to say that now.
“But we can take confidence from that game, 100 per cent. We know we have the quality to beat that South African outfit.
“They are obviously a good side, don’t get me wrong. They are world champions for a reason. But we can take genuine belief from that game.
“We know we have the tools to win a game like that. But obviously actions speak
louder than words.”
Of the four changes made by Gregor Townsend to his starting line-up, Stuart McInally stood up best to South African pressure. Rufus McLean was well policed, Matt Scott hardly got going, and Nick Haining found it tough against the back row of Siya Kolisi, Kwagga Smith and Duane Vermeulen. The hooker was as self-critical as always, but, like Skinner, insisted that Scotland could take a measure of satisfaction from the aspects of their play that had gone relatively well.
“We came up against a very good scrum,” McInally said. “They were powerful and they were well coached, and there were a few times we creaked a little - but there were a few times I thought we got into good shape and rhythm as well but didn’t get the rewards.
“We have got to give credit to them at the set piece: their set-piece team came and delivered. I think on the whole we could have been better at scrum time, definitely, and we have to solve a few issues there, but credit to them for the way they played.”
While Scotland conceded a fair number of penalties, a lot of their defensive play stood up well against the most physical team in world rugby. And, as McInally pointed out, the attack looked pretty sharp at times too.
“We believe we’re a physical team, and we showed that in large parts of our defence,” he continued. “I was really proud of the defensive effort and if you look at the way we scored our tries it was from moving the ball. That was part of our plan, and it was good to see us pick up a couple of tries - but we maybe needed to take a few more of those opportunities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here