Former MP Natalie McGarry has told a court she did not embezzle money from two pro-independence campaign groups.
Ms McGarry is giving evidence in her own defence at Glasgow Sheriff Court.
The former MP, 40, who represented Glasgow East for the SNP, allegedly stole more than £25,000 between April 2013 and August 2015.
She is said to have embezzled £21,000 while treasurer for Women for Independence (WFI) between April 26, 2013 and November 30, 2015.
A second charge states Ms McGarry took £4,661 between April 9, 2014 and August 10, 2015 when she was treasurer, secretary and convenor of Glasgow Regional Association (GRA) of the SNP.
Ms McGarry, of Clarkston, East Renfrewshire, denies the two charges at Glasgow Sheriff Court.
She began her evidence by stating that she suffers from a condition which affects her vocal nerves and is impacted by her mental health.
Her defence counsel Allan MacLeod asked her: “Did you embezzle money from the organisation Women for Independence?”
Ms McGarry replied: “Certainly not.”
She also denied embezzling money from the GRA of the SNP.
Ms McGarry claimed that she joined WFI in order to bridge the gap between male and female voices in the independence campaign.
She claimed to have taken a more hands-on role with the administration side of WFI after an unpaid bill of £187 was sent to one of the organisation's email accounts which had not been dealt with.
Ms McGarry told the jury that it was "embarrassing" as the printing firm owed the cash was a personal contact.
She claimed that she and fellow founding member Shona McAlpine did the "donkey work" for the organisation.
Ms McGarry later said: "I'm a good organiser but I'm not the most organised person, this is not what I signed up for.
"I believed in the organisation and independence, someone had to step up and do it and there didn't seem as if there were people doing it.
"It was just falling by the wayside and I didn't want it to fail and Shona McAlpine didn't want it to fail."
She said that the pair pushed WFI through 2013 and 2014 and added that they were "overwhelmed”.
Ms McGarry claimed she was unemployed at the time and was being helped out financially by her parents.
She claimed that her "arm was pulled" when she decided to stand as a candidate in the Cowdenbeath byelection for Holyrood in 2013.
She was defeated and later stood again for the SNP at the 2015 UK general election as a candidate for Glasgow East where she was elected.
Ms McGarry said: "My campaign team were the best and deserved someone who would give their all to the campaign and I did and they did - we exhausted ourselves.
"There was nothing that we didn't do that we could have."
Ms McGarry added that she was not "focused enough" on WFI business during the election campaign.
Ms McGarry was visibly emotional when she told the jury that she did not stand for election again in 2017.
She said: "This was hanging over me and I wasn't able to fight the election again and I was pregnant as well."
The trial continues before sheriff Tom Hughes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article