RUPERT NEATE
A children's charity has called for a ban on "ruthless and exploitative" advertising directed at youngsters.
A poll by the Children's Society found almost nine in 10 (89%) adults believe children are more materialistic than previous generations.
Doctors are also concerned children's preoccupation with the latest trends could lead to mental health problems.
The Good Childhood report, which accompanied the poll, found: "Advertising to children was ruthless and exploitative and they should not be viewed as small consumers, particularly for younger children with impressionable minds."
Bob Reitemeier, chief executive of the charity, said: "If an advert is described as ruthless it is clearly inappropriate and raises questions about how we value children. These ads should be banned.
"Children either purchase or have an important influence on purchases worth £30bn a year. That's a big market."
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, patron of the inquiry, said: "The selling of lifestyles to children creates a culture of material competitiveness and promotes acquisitive individualism at the expense of the principles of community and co-operation."
Professor Philip Graham, professor of child psychiatry at the Institute of Child Health, London, who is leading the charity's inquiry into children's lifestyles, said: "One factor that may be leading to rising mental health problems is the increasing degree to which children and young people are preoccupied with possessions - the latest in fashionable clothes and electronic equipment."
But Baroness Buscombe, chief executive of the Advertising Association, said: "Calls for advertising bans are ill-considered. Such simplistic calls have no basis in evidence and restrictions would have unintended consequences.
"In Sweden, the ban on advertising to children under 12 has been in place since 1991 but, as the government's Foresight Report website demonstrates, there is no clear evidence of its efficacy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article