They are often portrayed as remote and isolated ‘on the edge’ of Scotland where things are done differently.
Lying outwith the mainland, the islands of the Hebrides have gained an almost mythical status as far-flung outposts where life has been slow to catch up with developments elsewhere.
But now fresh research is challenging the traditional view of places such as Barra, Lewis and Canna, while also shining a light on the biases which developed and still linger today.
It is coming to light that in ancient times the islands were home to a vibrant and outward-looking people who traded far and wide using the highways of the sea.
Long, long before Calmac was a thing, people navigated the waters in boats big enough to transport livestock, possibly sailing as far as Ireland to trade for stone tools and other items, while criss-crossing the waters between their island homes to treat with each other.
PhD student Mairi MacLean, herself from Barra, has spent years studying the movement of people and animals across the Inner and Outer Hebrides during the Neolithic and Bronze ages.
Vatersay Bay, Barra
Ms MacLean, who will present her research at an online seminar this Friday, said that the academic world has been slow to recognise the endeavors and ingenuity of the islands’ prehistoric people.
She said: “For centuries, particularly in prehistory, the fastest way to travel anywhere and to move objects or large-scale things, would be over water whether that’s rivers or seas.
“With the inner Hebrides and outer Hebrides, going not too far back – maybe to the Middle Ages or the Vikings - The Vikings are generally considered to have been very well connected. They went all the way to the Middle east and Iceland and Greenland.
“That was by boat, not by land. And it’s interesting that the culture of the Vikings is seen in that way (as voyagers and explorers), whereas the more Celtic fringes of Scotland are not.”
Using isotope analysis of chemical traces left in ancient animal bones, Ms Maclean’s research has established that there was significant movement of animals across the Hebrides in ancient times.
So far, her work has centered on those of red deer – which were moved across the Outer Hebrides, and cattle, which circulated in the inner islands.
No remains of boats big enough to move herds of animals has been found, but other research and archeological finds has established that coracles - vessels made from animal hide stretched on a wicker frame – and dugout canoes would likely have been familiar to the island seafarers.
A reconstructed coracle
Wooden boats are unlikely to have been preserved, though the search goes on. It is possible that the remains of a larger craft could be found.
But while wood rots, stone is permanent and it is such solid artefacts that are providing the most telling clues to interconnected island life thousands of years ago.
An arrowhead found on the island of lewis made from bloodstone could only have come from one place – and outcrop of the material on the island of Rum.
Similarly, stone axes made of porcellanite from County Antrim in Ireland have been found across the Hebrides as well as the rest of Britain, including the islands of Arran, Barra, Eigg, Islay and Mull.
All this adds up to a tantalising picture of a vibrant, seafaring history for the ancient inhabitants of the isles.
But one that will only become fully known if people give up their preconceptions of these ‘remote’ regions.
Ms Maclean said: “I think the reason depends on the islands in question and the cultures in question. With respect to the Hebrides I think it may be linked into the fact they were populated by Gaelic speakers.
“Highlanders and Gaelic speakers in the past couple of centuries haven’t necessarily been viewed with the most positive of lights through the rest of the UK.
“That kind of comes into it, especially nowadays as the Hebrides are considered the ‘last bastion’ of Gaelic. I think that ties into it a lot – it makes them sound more old-fashioned, maybe culturally backwards.
“That’s one of the ways this has entered the UK’s social consciousness.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel