New research has revealed that there has been a 'significant' increase in the number of urban birds in Scotland.
NatureScot’s latest report, which looked at 14 species of urban birds, shows an increase of 19% between 1994 and 2019.
A number of birds have seen an upsurge across all habitats, but there have been more rapid increases in urban areas.
In particular, typical garden birds such as blue tits, great tits and goldfinches have seen rises in their numbers.
Although increased use of birdfeeders are likely a key factor, these species showed even higher population increases on farmland, so other factors, such as climate change, are likely to have contributed as well.
READ MORE: Avian flu crisis leaves seabird populations on the cliff edge
Woodpigeons saw the biggest increase: their numbers increased by 6% across the whole of Scotland, but swelled by 188% in urban areas.
This increase could be due to fewer nest predators, such as carrion crows and magpies, and less competition from urban breeding collared doves, which have suffered a 46% drop.
Milder winters are also helping this highly adaptable bird, so they can breed all year-round with our towns offering a safe haven.
Meanwhile, house sparrows, song thrushes and blackbirds all declined in urban areas – although they increased across other habitats. Possible reasons for their urban declines include poorer food quality for chicks and increases in disease and predation in towns and cities.
NatureScot’s Trends and Indicators Analyst, Simon Foster said: “We know that some bird species use more than one habitat and their habitat preferences evolve over time, based on a variety of factors from availability of food to climate change. Wood pigeons are a good case in point, responding to milder winters and the safety of towns to help them increase.
“We all need to play our part, putting nature at the heart of solutions to climate change and biodiversity loss, and there are lots of practical things people can do to help birds in their local areas.
"I’d suggest putting out bird feeders and keeping them regularly topped up and providing nest boxes. We’d also encourage people to plant hedgerows or let their existing hedges grow thickly to provide food and shelter for many bird species.
The report improves on past terrestrial breeding bird indicators by adding a new urban category and refining the farmland category to show arable, pastoral (grazing), wet and woody farmland trends. It also includes a general wetland bird indicator. These improvements will help measure progress towards climate change and biodiversity targets.
Simon added: “These new statistics will help us uncover an extra layer of data to improve our understanding of what is happening to bird populations in different types of habitats across Scotland, allowing us to take more targeted conservation action to help the most under-threat species.”
For farmland, a positive trend emerged across pastoral habitats, with a 31% increase in birds on grazing pastures, compared to declines in birds on arable and wet farmland. On wetlands, there was an overall 19% decline in water birds, particularly among waders such as common sandpiper, curlew, lapwing, oystercatcher and redshank.
Lapwing and curlew breed on wet grassland and upland habitats and are experiencing declines across all types of farmland, wetland and upland habitats in Scotland, and more widely in the UK. Habitat loss, land drainage and increases in predation are thought to be contributing to their declines.
Species showing large population increases include sand martin, reed bunting and mute swan. Sand martins and reed buntings are showing greater increases in Scotland than in England, possibly due to climate change.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel