I FEEL I must respond to a couple of points made by Eric Melvin (Letters, February 1). Firstly, regarding his call for council tax to be raised for the three highest tax bands, F, G and H.
The value of one's home often has no relationship to the income of the owner, especially when they have lived in that home for many years. My wife and I have lived in our home for 26 years. The house is probably worth considerably more than we paid for it but we wouldn’t know as we have no interest in its current value. It is our home and it is where we intend to spend our remaining years.
We are both retired and on fixed incomes which have not and are not keeping pace with inflation. This means that the council tax takes up a larger proportion of our income with each year that passes. As it happens our home is in band E, which would be unaffected by Mr Melvin’s plans, but there will be many in the higher council tax bands whose situation is very similar to ours.
It isn’t too difficult to imagine that if implemented, this scheme would soon be expanded to include lower tax bands. The fact that the valuations were done many years ago is completely irrelevant as the current difference in property values between the different tax bands will generally be proportionately the same as before.
Secondly, in regard to entrance fees at National Trust for Scotland properties: a number of years ago to break a long journey we decided to pop into the NTS Glencoe Visitor Centre that we happened to see signposted at the roadside.
We had planned to use the toilets then go to the restaurant for lunch. Then I discovered that there was a charge of several pounds just to park. If we had gone in and purchased lunch, as we had planned to, I’m sure that would have been recompense enough for allowing us to park there for around an hour or so.
Needless to say we left and carried on to Ballachulish, where we found free parking and all the facilities and services that we required. I am happy to pay for services rendered but draw the line at exploitation.
David Clark, Tarbolton
• I AGREE with Eric Melvin's plans to fund local council services. Can he arrange to send some tourists and a national museum to Neilston and we will give it a shot?
Allan McDougall, Neilston.
Give hospitality sector a boost
SOMETIMES an idea comes along with which there is really no argument.
The plea by Alan Tomkins that more consideration should be given to the hospitality industry ("Glasgow restaurateur calls for city to embrace hospitality sector", The Herald, February 1) is irrefutable.
Reducing VAT to say 5% would be an enormous incentive to potential customers and encourage repeat business which is so important. This was a tactic which already proved its worth during the pandemic and should be repeated.
As someone who does their best to support independent business of all kinds, I know it would make a difference to me.
Brendan Keenan, Glasgow
The gas boiler timebomb
THE Scottish Government's Heat in Buildings Strategy, headed up by Patrick Harvie, the Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings, Active Travel and Tenants' Rights, is not about reducing the cost of heating our homes. In fact it admits that costs will rise. Its purpose is to force decarbonisation of our heating systems, majoring on replacing gas and oil boilers with heat pumps.
Paragraph 87 of Annex A Summary of Actions states: "We will phase out the need to install new or replacement fossil fuel boilers in off-gas areas from 2025 and in on-gas areas from 2030." Yet in Chapter 5 of the main report they admit that moving to electrical heating will require a big infrastructure investment in electricity generation and supply. They admit that "the cost of this investment could be significant", but give no estimate of the huge sum involved.
Make no mistake, if this legislation is passed by Holyrood it will cost homeowners thousands to comply. When this becomes widely known it will make the public outrage over the SNP's gender change polices look like a storm in a tea cup.
William Loneskie, Lauder
My thoughts for today
OVER many years my early choice of listening has been Today on BBC Radio 4. In recent months I have detected a degree of distortion in pronunciation by both presenters and contributors.
Regional accents are quite acceptable as they can reflect particular interests. Sadly these have generally disappeared in favour of quite bland and characterless English.
If this were not enough the English is being distorted by the complete absence of "r" and any word ending in "ay" ( as in "hay") being pronounced "ie" (as in "die"). Such extreme distortion sometimes make concentration difficult and indeed I have switched off on occasion – am I listening to a foreign language ?
I also note the return of the dreaded "absolutely". It had almost disappeared but has recovered to infest the airwaves.
Ken Cameron, Cupar
Stretching out the curve
JOE Biden has announced he will end the Covid state of emergency on May 11 ("International In Brief", The Herald, February 1). The worst thing about “three weeks to flatten the curve” is the first three years.
Geoff Moore, Alness
Clued up on a burial
DAVID Miller’s reference (Letters, February 1) to the late John McKie, composer of the Wee Stinker Crossword, reminds me of the cruciverbalist who specified in his Last Will and Testament that he should be buried “3 Down and 2 Across”.
R Russell Smith, Largs
Life's hard lessons
SOCRATES, according to Plato, said that "the unexamined life is not worth living". Neil Mackay, quoting Socrates, said "Hail the national treasure who returned his OBE" (The Herald, January 31), where he praises Alan Cumming for doing so. Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007), the American writer, in his book Wampeters, Foma and Granfalloons said: "What if the examined life turns out to be a clunker as well?"
Just a thought.
Thelma Edwards, Kelso
Letters should not exceed 500 words. We reserve the right to edit submissions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel