A forensic pathologist who conducted the post-mortem examination of Sheku Bayoh told the inquiry into his death that injuries he sustained could be as a result of weight or pressure being applied to him.
The public inquiry resumed on Tuesday and is hearing evidence from medical experts including the doctor who conducted the post-mortem examination in 2015, Dr Kerryanne Shearer.
Mr Bayoh died when he was restrained by six police officers on Hayfield Road in Kirkcaldy on the morning of May 3 2015.
Marking eight years since Mr Bayoh had died, inquiry chairman Lord Bracadale prefaced Tuesday’s sitting with a message that members of the public could find the evidence taken to be distressing.
READ MORE: Yousaf only leader not to say 'God save the King' in Coronation debate
Dr Shearer told the inquiry she incorporated information about the use of handcuffs and restraint into her examination which found Mr Bayoh had around eight small “dot” haemorrhages in his eyes, consistent with injuries that may have related either to positional asphyxia or being resuscitated.
She also said Mr Bayoh’s breathing could have been potentially impeded by officers restraining him, without having to put weight on him.
Ms Grahame also asked Dr Shearer if there was anything that would indicate weight or pressure being applied.
“There wasn’t anything that was categorically indicative,” Dr Shearer said.
“We looked at the back and there was some subcutaneous haemorrhage under the skin, suggesting blunt force was applied.
“I can’t categorically say what that blunt force was, but if it is suggested to me, ‘could this be someone pressing down?’ then yes, it could.”
Dr Shearer told the inquiry that immediately after the post-mortem examination, there was no clear cause of death.
“This is the cause of death given immediately after the post-mortem with the information I have, that I have deemed from the post-mortem and the external and internal examination.
“In this case there was no obvious cause of death at the time of the post-mortem, hence why it is unascertained pending investigation.”
Dr Shearer said she had conducted investigations throughout the examination that would ultimately lead to the final cause of death.
READ MORE: 'Not acceptable': Locals forced to make 85-mile round trip for petrol
An initial report, she said, allows the police and crown to “move forward” with their investigations.
Dr Shearer said she had been under pressure to complete the post-mortem examination as quickly as possible after his death.
She said: “I remember at the time when I took the phone call on the Sunday, there was already a lot of media interest and there was a lot of information out there.
“There was police involvement so obviously there were questions as well.
“I do remember there being a reasonable amount of stress and a reasonable amount of pressure to get the post-mortem done as quickly as possible.
“There was pressure I had never felt before (to get post-mortem examination completed as quickly as possible).”
Dr Shearer also described a superficial injury Mr Bayoh had sustained to his mouth which could be a sign of blunt force by an object, the ground or his tooth.
The forensic pathologist explained it could also have been as a result of medical intervention such as intubation.
She described there being seven superficial cuts to his mouth and lips.
She said: “When you start to see lots of injuries in the mouth, it makes me less inclined to say it’s because of resuscitation, and more inclined to say it’s because of blunt force trauma.”
Dr Shearer described how these injuries could be sustained by being on the ground and the mouth moving against it which “pulls” the mouth.
The inquiry, before Lord Bracadale, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article