Figures showing that more than 300 patients with mental health problems had to stay in hospital waiting for care – including one patient who had their discharge delayed for more than nine years – have been branded “intolerable” by Scottish Tories.
Conservative health spokesman Dr Sandesh Gulhane said: “The fact that one patient has been unnecessarily holed up in hospital for nigh-on a decade ought to shame Humza Yousaf and co.”
He hit out after data obtained by the Conservatives using freedom of information showed that 356 mental health patients were kept in hospital, despite meeting the criteria to be discharged.
The true figure could be even higher, as two of the country’s 11 mainland health boards did not supply figures – with the islands health boards not having in-hospital mental health patients.
Read More: Yousaf facing byelection 'thumping' as SNP support evaporates
While the average delay patients experienced was 178 days, NHS Lothian revealed that one patient had their departure from hospital delayed by between 3,000 and 3,500 days – a period of up to about nine and a half years.
NHS Lothian also had the highest number of mental health patients who suffered a delayed discharge, with 96 people affected by this, with an average delay of 336 days.
NHS Fife said it had one patient who was delayed by more than six years, with discharge held up for 2,489 days.
Meanwhile, both NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Tayside had patients who were delayed by more than 1,000 days – with waits of 1,080 and 1,061 days respectively.
Dr Gulhane, who is a GP as well as sitting as a Scottish Conservative MSP, said: “These intolerable stats are both deeply concerning and a damning indictment of the SNP’s mismanagement of our NHS.”
He stated: “Delayed discharge has knock-on effects across the health service – impacting on A&E waiting times and cancelled operations – but first and foremost it is soul-destroying for the patients directly concerned.
“It’s extremely distressing for anyone to be stuck in hospital when they are fit to leave but for vulnerable mental health patients it is especially damaging to their well-being.”
Dr Gulhane added: “The SNP’s abject failure to tackle delayed discharge – by ensuring social care packages are in place for patients capable of leaving hospital – continues to do enormous damage and must be tackled immediately.”
Tracey McKigen, services director for the Royal Edinburgh and Associated Services at NHS Lothian, said: “We’ve made significant improvements to mental health services and continue to work with the health and social care partnerships to reduce discharge delays.
“Some patients have highly complex needs and must have bespoke care plans in place in the community before they can be discharged.”
Read More: Inside the campaign to revolutionise Scottish universities' student drug use policy
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “It is critical that people are cared for in the right setting as we continue to face pressures on out health and social care system.
“That is why we have put in place the Delayed Discharge and Hospital Occupancy Action Plan to support health boards to create the necessary capacity to deal with emerging pressures.
“We will continue to work with the health boards and health and social care partnerships as they introduce these actions.
“The Scottish Budget for 2023/24 provides record funding of over £19bn for health and social care, providing new investment of over £1bn and supporting recovery and reform to secure sustainable public services. This includes £1.7bn for social care and integration in 2023/24.
“We want people to be supported in a home that is right for them and for people with learning disabilities and complex care needs who face delayed discharges, the Scottish Government is working with practitioners and professionals and people with lived experience, to progress the recommendations in the Coming Home Implementation Repo
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here