The political story which has dominated domestic headlines all week has been that of health secretary Michael Matheson and his infamous iPad.
The SNP MSP racked up a bill of £11,000 while on holiday in Morocco, a sum which was initially to be reimbursed, in part, by the taxpayer.
Mr Matheson then agreed to pay back the sum himself, and a breakdown of the charges revealed that the bulk of the cost was accumulated on two days - both of which saw Celtic in Scottish Premiership action.
On Thursday the health secretary stood before Holyrood and explained that his sons had used his iPad to hotspot from in order to watch fixtures against Hibs and Rangers while on holiday.
In her column for the Herald on Sunday, Dani Garavelli has analysed the fallout from the story - and explained why, despite what some would say, it is important.
Read More: Brian Taylor: Michael Matheson got it wrong - the question is how badly
She argues that while struggling with technology is relatable, and Mr Matheson's iPad is not a scandal on the scale of Rwanda deportations or Greensill, it's not to be dismissed out of hand.
Writing in today's Herald on Sunday, she says: "Whether you view Matheson’s iPad lapse as a major or minor misdemeanour, it does matter. It matters because transparency matters, because respect for public funds and those you were elected to serve matters, because accepting the consequences of your mistakes matters.
"It matters because the erosion of morality in public life is incremental; because one lie feeds another until one day you are being told Brexit will deliver an extra £350m a week to the NHS, and no-one bats an eyelid.
"It matters because in a world where ethical boundaries are being breached almost daily, it becomes doubly important to cling to our values. To set down a marker for our politicians. To remind them of what is and isn’t acceptable; and what will and will not be tolerated."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel