Humza Yousaf is to lead a debate on a ceasefire in Gaza on today.
Mr Yousaf tabled a motion on Monday which will be debated in Holyrood, calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in the conflict, as well as condemning the “barbaric and unjustifiable” Hamas attacks of October 7 and demanding the release of all hostages taken.
On Monday, the First Minister said: “This week, the Scottish Parliament has an opportunity to unite to send a message of peace to world leaders and to those enduring untold suffering in the Middle East.
“The motion that will be debated, tabled today, condemns the barbaric and unjustifiable actions of Hamas, and echoes the calls of the UN Secretary-General for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire.”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf - MPs who refused to back ceasefire in Gaza 'unforgivable'
He added: “An immediate ceasefire is the only way to end the tragic deaths of civilians.
“This week, I urge MSPs of all parties to come together and say enough is enough – the time for a ceasefire is now.”
It is understood that the First Minister will steer clear of overt partisanship during his speech, instead drawing on his personal family experience of the conflict.
Mr Yousaf’s in-laws, Elizabeth and Maged El-Nakla, visited family ahead of the October 7 attack, becoming trapped in Gaza when the Israeli retaliation started.
Both were eventually able to flee through the Rafah border crossing in the south of the Gaza Strip.
The pair, however, were forced to leave family in the region, including their son, who works as a doctor and who Mr Yousaf said on Sunday was in a “terrible way”.
Anas Sarwar said he supported a ceasefire (Jane Barlow/PA)
Scottish Labour confirmed on Monday the party would back the calls for a ceasefire, while a report in The Scotsman newspaper claimed the Scottish Lib Dems would also vote in favour.
The motion comes less than a week after a major rebellion among Labour MPs at Westminster on the same issue.
Sir Keir Starmer lost eight frontbenchers as a result of the vote, in which he had whipped MPs not to back a ceasefire.
READ MORE: Sarwar insists Labour MSPs will vote for Gaza ceasefire in Holyrood
An amendment to the Scottish Government motion, tabled by Labour, will include calls for the International Criminal Court to investigate all parties in the conflict.
The party has also hit out at the conduct of the SNP, accusing them of playing “petty politics” by attacking Labour, with First Minister Humza Yousaf calling on leader Anas Sarwar to “stand firm” and back a ceasefire, despite statements of support for the move in recent weeks.
A Labour spokesperson said: “This is a profoundly disappointing approach from the SNP publicly.
“Since last Thursday, the SNP and Scottish Labour have been working on both a motion and amendment which represented the broad consensus across the Parliament.
“Before this statement, business managers from both parties had agreed to support both the SNP’s motion and Labour’s amendment.”
The spokesperson added: “Despite agreement between Labour and the SNP on both the motion calling for an immediate ceasefire, and the Labour amendment which goes further, the SNP have now indicated they want to play petty politics with this issue instead.
“The SNP press office should retract this shameful attack which tarnishes the work both parties have done behind the scenes on this important issue.”
Get the morning's headlines — Direct to your inbox
Ross Greer, the Scottish Greens external affairs spokesman, said every one of the party’s MSPs will vote for the motion.
“Enough is enough. Israel’s relentless bombing campaign has already killed 15,000 people, including at least 5,000 children,” he said.
“If the international community and governments like Scotland’s use our voice to call for peace, it can make a difference.
”Today’s vote is an opportunity for MSPs from all parties to come together and send a clear message of solidarity to the people of Gaza.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel