Lecturers will return to work at City of Glasgow College after an agreement was found to end a long-running dispute over proposed job cuts - with no compulsory redundancies.
The college had been looking to impose 100 compulsory redundancies on top of 75 voluntary ones as it looks to cope with a budget shortfall of around £6m.
Members of the EIS-FELA union had been in dispute with management since February, with strikes and action short of a strike taking place throughout the year.
Strikes were suspended at the end of November though following positive talks, and an agreement has now been reached.
EIS-FELA have voted to accept a proposal which will mean there will be no compulsory redundancies at the college, with 86% voting in favour.
Read More: City of Glasgow college strike: Warning over ASN staff cuts
The new agreement means that 30 lecturers will be offered voluntary severance, subject to a payment of a maximum of six months’ salary.
Those who do not wish to accept the severance will be offered redeployment, retraining, reskilling or upskilling, as an alternative where possible.
Where no agreement can be reached, there will be an opportunity to offer voluntary severance on the same terms to another person who wishes to substitute themselves.
Those who have already left because of compulsory redundancy will be put back on the payroll until at least December 22, offered the opportunity to return to work at the college or come to a severance agreement.
As a result strike action will end with immediate effect and student results will be uploaded onto systems as quickly as possible.
Commenting on the ballot result, EIS General Secretary Andrea Bradley said, “This very clear ballot result brings the programme of industrial action at City of Glasgow College to an end. EIS-FELA members at the college are to be commended for the strong stance they have taken in defence of lecturing jobs and quality education provision at the college.
"It has been a long and difficult struggle which has taken its toll on lecturers and students alike, but it was a price worth paying to fight job and course cuts and to protect education for today’s and tomorrow’s students at the college.”
Charlie Montgomery, EIS-FELA Branch Convener at City of Glasgow College, said, "We are obviously delighted that this dispute has been brought to an end without the unnecessary compulsory redundancies originally demanded by the college.
"We hope, going forward, the college will recognise the need to abide by the principles of 'Fair Work' and no longer try to enforce upon staff, changes in their employment status, or terms and conditions without proper negotiations with recognised trade unions.
"It is to be hoped, with proper governance put in place and the adoption of a collegiate attitude, City of Glasgow College can look forward to a more stable period of industrial relations that should benefit staff and students alike.”
A City of Glasgow College spokesperson said: "As EIS-FELA acknowledged to us, the reductions in staff numbers were absolutely necessary to address the College's considerable deficit, which resulted from external factors, especially real-term cuts in our funding. Although the protracted strikes and resulting boycott which affected some of our students were unnecessary and calculated to inflict maximum disruption to learning at the College, we thank EIS-FELA for eventually making so many concessions. Compromises on both sides have helped secure this agreement.
“Both sides have worked positively together, and we are pleased that this agreement brings the local industrial disputes at the College to an end. Both parties acknowledge that we need to reset our relationship for the sake of all our students and staff.
“We can now ensure that our collective energies are focussed on delivering for our students and enabling them to flourish and maximise their potential in a world-class learning environment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel